South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 07 September 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju: match statistics

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Gwangju crest
Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sangju Sangmu played Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Sangju Sangmu: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Gwangju: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.92 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Gwangju scores 0.62 and concedes 2.19. League average: 2.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 62%, Gwangju 42%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 31%, Gwangju 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Sangju Sangmu has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.13. Sangju Sangmu: 12.7 shots per match, Gwangju: 9.0.

Match halves

Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.54. Gwangju: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (6 goals). Gwangju: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.43 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-4-1. Average goals 1.40, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sangju Sangmu have a clear home advantage: they lose just 25% of their matches in front of their own fans, while Gwangju have not won a single away game and have suffered defeat in 58% of such fixtures. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 14.17 shots and an xG of 1.64, compared with 8.83 shots and an xG of 1.07 for the visitors. Gwangju’s biggest issue remains their away defence, where they concede an average of 2.33 goals per match and allow opponents an xG of 1.69. Sangju have also been inefficient in front of goal, scoring just 0.83 goals per home game and finding the net only 3 times in their last 5 matches overall, so the risk of a draw remains high. Despite the hosts’ poor current run, the visitors’ extremely limited attacking output—Gwangju average just 0.42 goals away from home and fail to score in 67% of matches—supports a narrow Sangju Sangmu victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal signal points toward BTTS - No, as Gwangju score just 0.42 goals per match on average and failed to score in 67% of their games, while Sangju Sangmu did not score in 50% of their appearances. BTTS occurred in only 33% of Gwangju matches, well below the league average of 52%, while the figure for the home side was 50%. Both defences concede frequently, averaging 2.07 and 2.33 goals, respectively, but the visitors’ low conversion rate of 5% and just 2.42 shots on target per match limit their chances of scoring. The last five matches increase the case for BTTS - Yes to 60%, but Sangju Sangmu scored only 3 goals during this period, or 0.6 per match. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 71% of Sangju Sangmu’s matches and 58% of Gwangju’s. Both teams have limited potential for a high-scoring game, as the hosts average 0.79 goals and the visitors just 0.42 goals per match; neither side has scored more than 2 goals in more than 7% and 0% of matches, respectively. At the same time, Gwangju’s weaker defense, conceding 2.33 goals per match, and the xG figures of 1.19 and 1.07 raise the projection to 2.48 goals and support at least two goals. Gwangju have conceded 10 goals in their last five matches, but Sangju Sangmu have scored just 3 during that period, limiting the risk of four or more goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Sangju Sangmu were level at the break in 64% of their matches, while both teams score very few goals in the first half: 0.29 and 0.25 per game, respectively. After the break, the advantage should shift to the home side, as Gwangju concede an average of 1.58 goals in second halves while scoring just 0.17 themselves. Sangju Sangmu have the higher average xG, 1.19 compared with 1.07, and also register more shots on target, 3.43 versus 2.42 for their opponents. The visitors’ weak defence, conceding an average of 2.33 goals per match, gives the hosts a realistic chance of settling an evenly matched first half after the interval. The X/1 scenario is therefore the strongest, although the high share of draw-related outcomes stems from the fact that the home side won only 7% of their matches, while the visitors drew as many as 42% of theirs.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Sangju SangmuGwangju
5Shots3
Sangju SangmuGwangju
2Shots on target2
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.9xG0.58
Sangju SangmuGwangju
4Corners1
Sangju SangmuGwangju
60Dangerous attacks33
Sangju SangmuGwangju
11Fouls10
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0Cards1
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.92Goals scored / match0.62
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.23Goals conceded / match2.19
Sangju SangmuGwangju
56%Average possession46%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
3.73Shots on target / match2.96
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.73Shots per match9
Sangju SangmuGwangju
3.73Shots on target2.96
Sangju SangmuGwangju
7.3%Shot conversion6.8%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
56%Possession46%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.51xG for1.13
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.34xG against1.85
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedGwangju: Balanced
Sangju SangmuGwangju
Accuracy (shots on target)29%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sangju Sangmu is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.4 pts / match - Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu
DDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
15% W58% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-15-7
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Gwangju
DLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
4% W35% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-9-16
0.46 pts / match · goal difference -41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-7
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sangju Sangmu is 48% better for: goals scored per match.

0.92 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.62 goals / match - Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu is 78% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.23 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 2.19 goals / match - Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 matches).

Gwangju scoring profile: mixed

Gwangju scores in 42% of matches (11 of 26 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).

24Goals scored (season)16
Sangju SangmuGwangju
32Goals conceded (season)57
Sangju SangmuGwangju
2.15Average goals in match2.81
Sangju SangmuGwangju
2Goals scored (last 5)5
Sangju SangmuGwangju
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
Sangju SangmuGwangju

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal42%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
15%2 goals15%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
8%3 goals4%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal85%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
35%2 goals54%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
12%3 goals35%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0%4 goals27%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
12%Scored in both halves8%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
40%BTTS - last 560%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sangju Sangmu is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.65 pts / match - Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
19% leading58% draw23% trailing
Gwangju - half-time state
4% leading54% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)0.65
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.27
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.96Average goals (1st half)1.12
Sangju SangmuGwangju
58%Clean sheet before half-time46%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
65%No goal before half-time77%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

After half-time (2nd half)

1.12Points per match (2nd half)0.54
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.65Goals conceded (2nd half)1.35
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Sangju SangmuGwangju
38%Clean sheet after half-time23%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
54%No goal after half-time73%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

19% W54% R27% P
30
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gwangju - second-half results

4% W42% R54% P
17
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-26
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 4%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal20%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Gwangju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
9
31-45
2
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Gwangju
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
1
7
16-30
3
8
31-45
4
15
46-60
3
5
61-75
2
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Gwangju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
190%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaGwangju
Average goals in match 2.152.43 2.81
Both teams scored 62%51% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%43% 50%
Clean sheets 23%31% 15%
Goal before half-time 58%60% 58%
Goal after half-time 73%76% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.43
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sangju SangmuGoalLee-Seok KimAssist: Jae-Hyun Ko
  2. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Ji-Hun JungOff: Se-Jong Ju
  3. Sangju SangmuGoalJae-Hyun Ko
  4. GwangjuGoalJohn IredaleAssist: Ji-Hun Jung
  5. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Jae-Min JeongOff: Geon-hee Lee
  6. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: In-Gyun KimOff: Jae-Hyun Ko
  7. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Se-Jin ParkOff: Sang-Heon Lee
  8. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Won-Jae ParkOff: Seong-Yoon Gwon
  9. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Joo-Chan KimOff: Yun-Sang Hong
  10. GwangjuSubstitutionOn: Yong KimOff: Sang-Ki Min
  11. GwangjuYellow cardSeok-Hwan Jang

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Sangju Sangmu 0 - 4 - 1 Gwangju. Average goals 1.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Gwangju
1 : 1
Sangju Sangmu
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 1
Gwangju
Gwangju FC
1 : 1
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Gwangju FC
1 : 0
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
0 : 0
Gwangju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?

The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 2:2 Gwangju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Gwangju?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 0, Gwangju won 1 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 1.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?

Sangju Sangmu score 0.92 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.62. The K League 1 average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 42% of Gwangju's.

What form are Sangju Sangmu and Gwangju in?

Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Gwangju 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?

The statistical background for Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.