South Korea - K League 2Mokdong StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics

Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners

Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seoul E-Land played Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Mokdong Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Seoul E-Land: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Ansan Greeners: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seoul E-Land scores 1.80 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Ansan Greeners scores 1.05 and concedes 1.85. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seoul E-Land 65%, Ansan Greeners 65%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 75%, Ansan Greeners 60%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.15. Seoul E-Land: 13.1 shots per match, Ansan Greeners: 8.6.

Match halves

Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.20. Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (11 goals). Ansan Greeners: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Seoul E-Land sit 2nd, while Ansan Greeners are only 15th, with the hosts’ overall season record standing at 11 wins and 5 defeats compared to the visitors’ 5 wins and 11 losses. At home, Seoul E-Land average 2.11 goals per match and have failed to score in none of their games, whereas Ansan average just one goal away from home and have been held scoreless in 38% of their away appearances. The hosts’ superiority is also evident in chance creation: their average xG is 1.62, while Ansan generate 1.02 xG away from home and allow opponents as much as 2.07 xG. Seoul average 13 shots and 5.67 shots on target per home match, clearly more than Ansan’s 7.63 shots and 3.5 shots on target away from home. Although the hosts have conceded 10 goals in their last five matches, the visitors have scored only 4 during that period, making a Seoul E-Land win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seoul E-Land have recorded BTTS in 83% of their matches this season and in 80% of their last five games, while also failing to keep a single clean sheet. The hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals per match, giving Ansan a realistic route to scoring despite their lower average of 1.0 goal per game. Ansan’s defence also favours opposition goals: they allow an average of 1.63 goals, while their average xG against is as high as 2.07. At the same time, Seoul E-Land have scored 2.0 goals per game in their last five appearances. The main risk to BTTS - Yes is Ansan’s weaker attacking output, having scored only 0.8 goals in their last five matches and recorded BTTS in 40% of them. However, the hosts’ highly vulnerable defence slightly tilts the prediction towards a Goal/Goal scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seoul E-Land concede an average of 2.00 goals per match and have kept no clean sheets, which significantly increases Ansan Greeners’ scoring potential. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.23 xG, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents 2.07 xG, so Seoul E-Land should have solid conditions to score at least once. In their last five matches, the hosts scored 10 goals and conceded 10, while Ansan also allowed 10 goals over the same period. The 1.5 line was exceeded in 92% of Seoul’s matches and 75% of Ansan’s, providing a considerably stronger signal than the more evenly balanced 2.5 line. The projected total of 2.70 goals indicates that Over 1.5 is the safest choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Seoul E-Land win after the match, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five games, while Ansan were trailing at half-time in as many as 80% of them. The opening phase should be relatively even: Seoul have averaged 0.4 goals before the break recently, compared with just 0.2 for Ansan. After half-time, the hosts clearly step up, scoring an average of 1.6 goals across their last five matches, compared with 0.6 for Ansan. Seoul’s advantage is also supported by their current form, with 2 wins and 2 draws in their last five games, while the visitors have won just once. Ansan’s defence allows opponents an average of 2.07 xG, which, combined with Seoul’s 1.23 xG created, increases the hosts’ chances of deciding the match after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
20Shots4
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
7Shots on target2
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
2.21xG0.74
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
6Corners6
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
64Dangerous attacks47
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
10Fouls3
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
1Cards0
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
1.8Goals scored / match1.05
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
1.25Goals conceded / match1.85
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
51%Average possession47%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
5.3Shots on target / match3.75
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.05Shots per match8.55
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
5.3Shots on target3.75
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
13.8%Shot conversion12.3%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
51%Possession47%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
1.59xG for1.15
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
1.3xG against2.01
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

Shooting quality

Seoul E-Land: Efficient finishingAnsan Greeners: Counter-attacking
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
Accuracy (shots on target)41%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 38% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.6 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Seoul E-Land
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W20% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-5
1.85 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Ansan Greeners
WLWDD
Season result split
25% W20% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-11
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.05 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Seoul E-Land is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.85 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

36Goals scored (season)21
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
25Goals conceded (season)37
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
3.05Average goals in match2.9
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
11Goals scored (last 5)6
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal75%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
60%2 goals20%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
30%3 goals5%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
5%4 goals5%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal90%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
40%2 goals55%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
15%3 goals30%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
0%4 goals5%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time30%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
35%Scored in both halves5%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
80%BTTS - last 560%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 0.85 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Seoul E-Land - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing
Ansan Greeners - half-time state
15% leading40% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)0.85
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.3
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
55%Clean sheet before half-time35%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
50%No goal before half-time55%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

After half-time (2nd half)

1.9Points per match (2nd half)1.15
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
2Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
45%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners
30%No goal after half-time65%
Seoul E-LandAnsan Greeners

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

55% W25% D20% L
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding183%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

30% W25% D45% L
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.60
Goals scored / match0.22.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.63.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.40
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-6+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
5
2
46-60
8
4
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Seoul E-LandLigaAnsan Greeners
Average goals in match▲ 3.052.76▲ 2.90
Both teams scored▲ 65%62%▲ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%55%▲ 60%
Clean sheets▲ 30%23%▼ 10%
Goal before half-time• 70%69%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 85%78%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ansan GreenersGoalMachop CholAssist: Gabriel Fernandes de Lima
  2. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Joo-Hyuk LeeOff: Joo-wan An
  3. Seoul E-LandYellow cardChang-Hwan Park
  4. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Seok-Joo YoonOff: Elosman Euller Silva Cavalcanti

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Seoul E-Land 2 - 2 - 0 Ansan Greeners. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Ansan Greeners
0 : 2
Seoul E-Land
Seoul E-Land FC
6 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
2 : 2
Seoul E-Land FC
Seoul E-Land FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC

FAQ

What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?

The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 3:1 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Ansan Greeners?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 2, Ansan Greeners won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?

Seoul E-Land score 1.80 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.05. The K League 2 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 65% of Ansan Greeners's.

What form are Seoul E-Land and Ansan Greeners in?

Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.