Finland - VeikkausliigaOmaSP StadionData current as of 03 September 2026

SJK vs Lahti: match statistics

SJK crest
SJK
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Lahti crest
Lahti

SJK vs Lahti: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK played Lahti in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 21 August 2026. Venue: OmaSP Stadion. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

SJK: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Lahti: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK scores 1.20 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Lahti scores 1.15 and concedes 0.90. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK 55%, Lahti 40%. Over 2.5: SJK 55%, Lahti 30%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.42. SJK: 13.5 shots per match, Lahti: 12.6.

Match halves

SJK: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.85. Lahti: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

SJK: 76-90+ (9 goals). Lahti: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SJK have the stronger case at home: they average 1.50 goals per match there, create chances worth 1.79 xG and register 5.1 shots on target. Lahti score just 0.67 goals per away game, while failing to find the net in 44% of such matches, which should limit their attacking potential. However, the hosts are not entirely reliable defensively, conceding an average of 1.30 goals at home while allowing opponents 1.40 xG, so a draw remains a realistic outcome. Lahti enter the match with a slightly better run of form over the last five rounds, collecting 7 points compared with SJK’s 4, and conceding only 3 goals during that period. Despite this, the visitors’ away record is poor — 56% losses and only 22% wins — so the home advantage and superior quality of chances created should be attributed to SJK.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Lahti’s limited attacking efficiency: away from home, they average just 0.67 goals and fail to score in 44% of matches. BTTS has occurred in only 33% of Lahti’s matches this season and just 20% of their last five, while SJK’s figures stand at 45% for the season and 40% in their recent run. SJK concede an average of 0.91 goals, and Lahti have conceded just 0.6 goals per match across their last five games, supporting a scenario in which at least one side keeps a clean sheet. The hosts should have chances to score, averaging 1.55 goals, but Lahti’s low 6% conversion rate compared with SJK’s 12.0% increases the risk that the visitors will fail to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

SJK score an average of 1.55 goals at home and concede just 0.91, while Lahti score only 0.67 goals per away match. Lahti have failed to score in 44% of their matches, while SJK have kept a clean sheet in 45% of their games, clearly limiting the prospects of a high-scoring performance from the visitors. SJK matches have finished with Under 3.5 goals in 82% of cases, while this scenario has occurred in all of Lahti’s matches so far. Under 2.5 goals has also been recorded in 64% and 78% of matches, respectively, although SJK’s last five games have been slightly more open, with 60% finishing Over 2.5 goals. An estimated 2.10 goals, combined with both teams’ effective defensive records, provides the strongest signal for Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

SJK have the clearer potential over the full 90 minutes: they score an average of 1.55 goals compared with Lahti’s 0.67, while their shot conversion rate stands at 12%, versus just 6% for the visitors. The hosts also have the stronger underlying quality indicators, with an average xG of 1.48, while Lahti allow opponents an xG of 1.44. The first-half picture is less clear, however: SJK have not led at the break in any of their last five matches and were trailing at half-time in as many as 80% of them, making a draw at half-time a safer scenario than a home lead. Lahti have been behind at half-time in 44% of their matches this season and average just 0.33 goals before the break, which limits their chances of holding onto an advantage until full-time. The X/1 pick best combines a cautious start with SJK’s greater quality and Lahti’s poor season-long scoring efficiency, with the visitors losing 56% of their league matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SJKLahti
16Shots16
SJKLahti
7Shots on target4
SJKLahti
1.85xG1.52
SJKLahti
4Corners5
SJKLahti
48Dangerous attacks32
SJKLahti
20Fouls12
SJKLahti
5Cards5
SJKLahti

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match1.15
SJKLahti
1.55Goals conceded / match0.9
SJKLahti
52%Average possession55%
SJKLahti
4.65Shots on target / match3.95
SJKLahti

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match12.6
SJKLahti
4.65Shots on target3.95
SJKLahti
8.9%Shot conversion9.1%
SJKLahti
52%Possession55%
SJKLahti
1.58xG for1.42
SJKLahti
1.47xG against1.25
SJKLahti

Shooting quality

SJK: BalancedLahti: Balanced
SJKLahti
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lahti is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - SJK · 1.4 pts / match - Lahti

SJK
LLWDL
Season result split
20% W30% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-10
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Lahti
WLWDL
Season result split
35% W25% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-8
1.30 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lahti is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.55 goals / match - SJK · 0.9 goals / match - Lahti

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

Lahti scoring profile: very strong

Lahti scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

24Goals scored (season)23
SJKLahti
31Goals conceded (season)18
SJKLahti
2.75Average goals in match2.05
SJKLahti
6Goals scored (last 5)5
SJKLahti
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
SJKLahti

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal70%
SJKLahti
35%2 goals30%
SJKLahti
20%3 goals5%
SJKLahti
0%4 goals5%
SJKLahti

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal60%
SJKLahti
55%2 goals25%
SJKLahti
15%3 goals5%
SJKLahti
0%4 goals0%
SJKLahti

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time20%
SJKLahti
10%BTTS in both halves5%
SJKLahti
25%Scored in both halves25%
SJKLahti

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
SJKLahti
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
SJKLahti
40%BTTS - last 520%
SJKLahti

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
SJKLahti
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
SJKLahti
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
SJKLahti

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
SJKLahti
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
SJKLahti
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
SJKLahti

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - SJK · 1.45 pts / match - Lahti

SJK - half-time state
20% leading30% draw50% trailing
Lahti - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.45
SJKLahti
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.7
SJKLahti
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
SJKLahti
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.15
SJKLahti
40%Clean sheet before half-time65%
SJKLahti
65%No goal before half-time45%
SJKLahti

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.25
SJKLahti
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
SJKLahti
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
SJKLahti
1.65Average goals (2nd half)0.9
SJKLahti
40%Clean sheet after half-time65%
SJKLahti
45%No goal after half-time60%
SJKLahti

SJK - second-half results

35% W30% R35% P
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lahti - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
1
4
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
13
46-60
4
1
61-75
9
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+108%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
4% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
4%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

SJKLigaLahti
Average goals in match 2.752.63 2.05
Both teams scored 55%50% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%48% 30%
Clean sheets 15%28% 40%
Goal before half-time 80%78% 70%
Goal after half-time 85%76% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiYellow cardJosé Claro Müller
  2. LahtiYellow cardJosé Claro Müller
  3. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Väinö VehkonenOff: Martim Augusto Ferreira
  4. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  5. LahtiYellow cardRomaric Yapi
  6. LahtiYellow cardMamodou Sarr
  7. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  8. SJKYellow cardRoope Paunio
  9. SJKYellow cardArmaan Wilson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: SJK 1 - 0 - 0 Lahti. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of SJK vs Lahti?

The Veikkausliiga match finished SJK 1:2 Lahti. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK vs Lahti?

SJK score 1.20 goals per game on average and Lahti 1.15. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 55% of SJK's matches and 40% of Lahti's.

What form are SJK and Lahti in?

Over the last 5 games SJK have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lahti 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK vs Lahti?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.