Portugal - LigaProEstádio Aurélio PereiraData current as of 30 August 2026

Sporting CP II vs Farense: match statistics

Sporting CP II crest
Sporting CP II
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Farense crest
Farense

Sporting CP II vs Farense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sporting CP II played Farense in LigaPro (Portugal). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Estádio Aurélio Pereira. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Sporting CP II: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match. Farense: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sporting CP II scores 0.67 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Farense scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sporting CP II 0%, Farense 100%. Over 2.5: Sporting CP II 0%, Farense 67%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Farense has higher xG: 2.25 vs 1.52. Sporting CP II: 13.0 shots per match, Farense: 20.7.

Match halves

Sporting CP II: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67. Farense: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.67.

Goals by minute

Sporting CP II: 46-60 (1 goals). Farense: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

LigaPro: 2.15 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Farense remain unbeaten this season, with a record of 2 wins and 1 draw, while Sporting CP II have already suffered one defeat. Away from home, the visitors average 3 goals per match and generate 2.82 xG, clearly above the hosts’ home averages of 1 goal and 1.37 xG. Farense’s advantage is also evident in their attacking intensity: they average 26 shots, including 11 on target, compared with Sporting’s 10 attempts and 5 shots on target. Sporting CP II have yet to concede at home, but their defence will have to contain a side that has scored 6 goals in its last five matches and boasts a slightly higher points average, 1.6 compared with 1.4. The hosts are a threat on home soil, so a draw remains a realistic outcome, but the superior quality of chances created by Farense points towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Farense has very strong offensive potential: it averages 3.0 goals, generates an xG of 2.82, and registers 11 shots on target per match, making a goal highly likely. The key uncertainty remains Sporting CP II, which has scored just 0.4 goals per match in its last 5 fixtures and recorded no BTTS - Yes results during that period. The hosts still generate a respectable xG of 1.43, but their finishing is clearly below the season average of 1.5 goals, increasing the risk that they will fail to convert their chances. The case for a Goal/Goal scenario is supported by the fact that both teams had a 100% BTTS rate in the season data and neither had kept a clean sheet. However, Sporting CP II’s current scoring form is the stronger argument against BTTS - Yes. Therefore, the most likely outcome is BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team fails to score, most likely through a Farense win with a clean sheet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Sporting CP II’s last five matches produced an average of just 0.4 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, with none of those games reaching at least three total goals. Farense has greater offensive potential, creating chances worth an average of 2.26 xG over this period, although its actual average was 1.2 goals scored per match. The hosts have recently generated 1.43 xG, but their poor finishing limits their projected goal tally to around 1.05. Although both teams recorded matches with goals at both ends early in the season, Sporting CP II’s tempo has clearly dropped, while Farense went over the 2.5-goal line in 60% of its last five appearances. The strongest pick is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.55 goals and the hosts’ very low recent scoring output clearly reduce the risk of four goals being scored.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a Farense victory at full-time, as a first-half draw occurred in 80% of the visitors’ last five matches and in 60% of Sporting CP II’s. Both teams tend to start cautiously: the hosts have averaged no goals before the break, while Farense have averaged just 0.2, resulting in low combined first-half averages of only 0.4 and 0.6 goals, respectively. After the break, the visitors’ attacking advantage should become more pronounced, with Farense averaging 1.0 goal across their last five second halves compared with Sporting’s 0.4. Over the course of the season, Farense have averaged 3.0 goals per match against 1.5 for the hosts, while also recording a higher xG figure, 2.82 compared with 1.98, and averaging 11 shots on target to Sporting’s 7. The hosts have conceded just 0.6 goals per match recently, making a draw at half-time more likely than an early lead for the visitors; however, Farense’s greater attacking quality points to a decisive outcome after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Sporting CP IIFarense
-1Shots-1
Sporting CP IIFarense
-1Shots on target-1
Sporting CP IIFarense
0xG0
Sporting CP IIFarense
-1Corners-1
Sporting CP IIFarense
0Dangerous attacks0
Sporting CP IIFarense
-1Fouls-1
Sporting CP IIFarense
-1Cards-1
Sporting CP IIFarense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sporting CP IIFarense
0.67Goals scored / match2
Sporting CP IIFarense
0.67Goals conceded / match1
Sporting CP IIFarense
59%Average possession53%
Sporting CP IIFarense
4.33Shots on target / match8.33
Sporting CP IIFarense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match20.67
Sporting CP IIFarense
4.33Shots on target8.33
Sporting CP IIFarense
5.1%Shot conversion9.7%
Sporting CP IIFarense
59%Possession53%
Sporting CP IIFarense
1.52xG for2.25
Sporting CP IIFarense
1.04xG against1.19
Sporting CP IIFarense

Shooting quality

Sporting CP II: BalancedFarense: Attacking
Sporting CP IIFarense
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Farense is 17% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Sporting CP II · 2.33 pts / match - Farense

Sporting CP II
WWL
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Farense
WWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.25Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Farense is 199% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - Sporting CP II · 2 goals / match - Farense

Sporting CP II is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Sporting CP II · 1 goals / match - Farense

Sporting CP II scoring profile: very strong

Sporting CP II scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Farense keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Farense scoring profile: strong

Farense scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Sporting CP II keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

2Goals scored (season)6
Sporting CP IIFarense
2Goals conceded (season)3
Sporting CP IIFarense
1.33Average goals in match3
Sporting CP IIFarense
2Goals scored (last 5)6
Sporting CP IIFarense
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Sporting CP IIFarense

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%2 goals67%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%3 goals33%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%4 goals0%
Sporting CP IIFarense

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
Sporting CP IIFarense
33%2 goals0%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%3 goals0%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%4 goals0%
Sporting CP IIFarense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%Scored in both halves33%
Sporting CP IIFarense

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%BTTS - last 5100%
Sporting CP IIFarense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sporting CP IIFarense

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Sporting CP IIFarense
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Sporting CP IIFarense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sporting CP II - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Farense - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)0.67
Sporting CP IIFarense
0Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Sporting CP IIFarense
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Sporting CP IIFarense
0.33Average goals (1st half)1
Sporting CP IIFarense
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Sporting CP IIFarense
100%No goal before half-time67%
Sporting CP IIFarense

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)3
Sporting CP IIFarense
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1.67
Sporting CP IIFarense
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Sporting CP IIFarense
1Average goals (2nd half)2
Sporting CP IIFarense
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Sporting CP IIFarense
33%No goal after half-time0%
Sporting CP IIFarense

Sporting CP II - second-half results

67% W0% R33% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Farense - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sporting CP II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.672.00
Goals scored / match0.00.7
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.31.0
1 goal33%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal100%33%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Farense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.673.00
Goals scored / match0.31.7
Goals conceded / match0.70.3
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal67%0%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sporting CP II
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Farense
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sporting CP II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.85
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Farense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).

Teams vs league

Sporting CP IILigaFarense
Average goals in match 1.332.15 3.00
Both teams scored 0%36% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%30% 67%
Clean sheets 67%35% 0%
Goal before half-time 33%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%73% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.15
Average goals per match
36%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-9%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Sporting CP II 1 - 0 - 1 Farense. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Sporting CP II vs Farense?

The LigaPro match finished Sporting CP II 2:1 Farense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sporting CP II and Farense?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sporting CP II won 1, Farense won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sporting CP II vs Farense?

Sporting CP II score 0.67 goals per game on average and Farense 2.00. The LigaPro average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Sporting CP II's matches and 100% of Farense's.

What form are Sporting CP II and Farense in?

Over the last 5 games Sporting CP II have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Farense 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sporting CP II vs Farense?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.