Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Super Nova vs Riga: match statistics
Super Nova vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Super Nova play Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Olaines stadions.
Current form
Super Nova: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Riga: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Super Nova scores 1.04 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Riga scores 2.90 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Super Nova 57%, Riga 62%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 50%, Riga 83%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Riga has higher xG: 2.00 vs 1.20. Super Nova: 9.4 shots per match, Riga: 16.9.
Match halves
Super Nova: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.54. Riga: half-time lead 66%, second-half goals 1.45.
Goals by minute
Super Nova: 76-90+ (9 goals). Riga: 31-45+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-6. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 50%.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Super Nova | Riga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Super Nova is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Super Nova · 1.2 pts / match - Riga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 179% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - Super Nova · 2.9 goals / match - Riga
Riga is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.03 goals / match - Riga
Super Nova scores in 79% of matches (22 of 28 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).
Riga scores in 97% of matches (28 of 29 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Super Nova
Over / Under - Riga
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - Super Nova · 2.14 pts / match - Riga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Super Nova - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 66% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (19 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Super Nova
Riga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Super Nova | Liga | Riga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.39 | 2.93 | ▲ 3.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 55% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Super Nova 0 - 0 - 6 Riga. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 50% matches.