Thun vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Thun vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Thun play Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 12 September 2026.
Current form
Thun: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Grasshopper: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Thun scores 1.83 and concedes 2.83 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.50 and concedes 2.33. League average: 3.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Thun 67%, Grasshopper 83%. Over 2.5: Thun 83%, Grasshopper 67%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 77%.
xG, shots and style
Grasshopper has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.59. Thun: 14.7 shots per match, Grasshopper: 15.5.
Match halves
Thun: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.33. Grasshopper: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Thun: 46-60 (4 goals). Grasshopper: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.82 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 77%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Thun | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.83 goals / match - Thun · 1.5 goals / match - Grasshopper
Grasshopper is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.83 goals / match - Thun · 2.33 goals / match - Grasshopper
Thun scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Grasshopper scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Thun
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grasshopper is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Thun · 1.5 pts / match - Grasshopper
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Thun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Thun
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Thun | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.67 | 3.82 | • 3.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 17% | 14% | ▲ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 92% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Thun 2 - 1 - 0 Grasshopper. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Thun and Grasshopper play?
Thun face Grasshopper on 12 September 2026 in Super League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Thun and Grasshopper?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Thun won 2, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Thun vs Grasshopper?
Thun score 1.83 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.50. The Super League average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Thun's matches and 83% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Thun and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Thun have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thun vs Grasshopper?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thun vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.