Thun vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Thun vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Thun played Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Stockhorn Arena. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Thun: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Grasshopper: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Thun scores 1.83 and concedes 2.83 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.50 and concedes 2.33. League average: 3.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Thun 67%, Grasshopper 83%. Over 2.5: Thun 83%, Grasshopper 67%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 77%.
xG, shots and style
Grasshopper has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.59. Thun: 14.7 shots per match, Grasshopper: 15.5.
Match halves
Thun: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.33. Grasshopper: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Thun: 46-60 (4 goals). Grasshopper: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.82 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 77%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Grasshopper come into the match in slightly better recent form: they have collected 7 points and scored 12 goals in their last five games, while Thun have earned 5 points and conceded as many as 15 goals. The hosts have a particularly serious problem at home, where they have not won a single match, failed to score, and concede an average of 3 goals per game. The visitors are also defensively weak away from home, averaging 2.67 goals conceded and keeping no clean sheets, but they at least score an average of 1.33 goals per match and have picked up points in one-third of their away games. The quality of chances slightly favors Grasshopper defensively, as their average xG of goals conceded stands at 1.52 compared with Thun’s 1.85, while the hosts’ overall trend points to declining finishing efficiency and defensive solidity. An open, goal-filled match is expected, but the visitors have the better chance of ending their away winless run.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is very clear: BTTS occurred in 67% of Thun’s matches and in all of Grasshopper’s games, compared with a league average of 74%. Neither team has recorded a single match without scoring, while Grasshopper have also failed to keep a clean sheet in every game. Thun average 1.67 goals at home, whereas Grasshopper concede as many as 2.67 goals away, strongly supporting a home goal. The visitors have averaged 2.4 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Thun have conceded 3.0 during the same period, making a Grasshopper goal highly likely as well. Their attacking potential is confirmed by xG: 1.95 for Thun at home and 1.87 for Grasshopper across their last five appearances, making BTTS - Yes the most likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams play in high-scoring games: Thun average 1.67 goals scored and 2.00 conceded, while Grasshopper score 1.33 and allow opponents to score 2.67 goals. In their last five matches, Grasshopper have improved their attacking efficiency to 2.4 goals per game, whereas Thun have conceded as many as 15 goals, or 3.0 per match. Their creative potential also points towards goals, with average xG standing at 1.95 for the hosts and 1.43 for the visitors, while the home side average 6.33 shots on target. At least two goals have been scored in 100% of both teams' matches so far, making Over 1.5 by far the strongest signal, although higher lines also have clear supporting evidence.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Thun leading at the break and the home side securing the win, as Thun were ahead at half-time in 2 of their 3 home matches, while Grasshopper have not led at the interval in any game. The hosts have yet to concede before half-time at home, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.33 goals in this phase. Thun also create more chances: their average xG is 1.95 compared with Grasshopper’s 1.43, while shots on target stand at 6.33 versus 3.00. Grasshopper have lost 67% of their away matches and concede an average of 2.67 goals on the road, reinforcing the prospect of the home side maintaining their lead. However, the visitors’ stronger recent form, with 2.4 goals scored per match across their last five games, increases the likelihood of a turnaround after half-time, particularly in the 1/2 and X/2 scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Thun | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.83 goals / match - Thun · 1.5 goals / match - Grasshopper
Grasshopper is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.83 goals / match - Thun · 2.33 goals / match - Grasshopper
Thun scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Grasshopper scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Thun
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grasshopper is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Thun · 1.5 pts / match - Grasshopper
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Thun - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Thun
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Thun | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.67 | 3.82 | • 3.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 17% | 14% | ▲ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 92% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Thun 2 - 1 - 0 Grasshopper. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Thun vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Thun 0:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Thun and Grasshopper?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Thun won 2, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Thun vs Grasshopper?
Thun score 1.83 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.50. The Super League average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Thun's matches and 83% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Thun and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Thun have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thun vs Grasshopper?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thun vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.