TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris: match statistics
TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
TransINVEST Vilnius played Žalgiris in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
TransINVEST Vilnius: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Žalgiris: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.66 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Žalgiris scores 1.52 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: TransINVEST Vilnius 62%, Žalgiris 45%. Over 2.5: TransINVEST Vilnius 69%, Žalgiris 55%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Žalgiris has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.41. TransINVEST Vilnius: 12.1 shots per match, Žalgiris: 14.9.
Match halves
TransINVEST Vilnius: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.90. Žalgiris: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
TransINVEST Vilnius: 31-45+ (10 goals). Žalgiris: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A Lyga: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams have collected 7 points from their last five matches, recording identical returns of 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats, so current form does not indicate a clear favourite. At home, TransINVEST score an average of 1.29 goals with an xG of 1.41, while Žalgiris create more high-quality chances away from home (xG 1.73) but score just 1.00 goal per match. The visitors are more solid defensively, conceding 0.79 goals per away game and keeping a clean sheet in 57% of matches, compared with 1.07 goals conceded and 43% clean sheets for the hosts. At the same time, Žalgiris fail to score in as many as 50% of their away matches, which limits the significance of their advantage in shots on target: 4.5 compared with 3.5 for TransINVEST. With home and away records closely matched and Žalgiris drawing in a high 36% of their away matches, a share of the points is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Žalgiris’ profile: only 21% of their league matches featured goals from both teams, while they failed to score in 50% of their games. The visitors are also highly solid defensively, conceding an average of 0.79 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 57% of their appearances. TransINVEST do average 1.93 goals and recorded BTTS in 64% of their matches, but they will face an opponent with a significantly stronger defense than their typical opponents. The last five matches also do not decisively support the Goal/Goal option, as Žalgiris recorded BTTS in only 20% of games despite creating chances worth 2.10 xG per match. The most likely scenario is therefore one in which at least one team—particularly Žalgiris, given their 50% rate of failing to score—does not find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Žalgiris has a very solid defense: it concedes just 0.79 goals per match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 57% of games, which should limit the hosts despite their average of 1.93 goals scored. In the away team’s matches, the Under 3.5 goals line has landed in as many as 93% of cases, while Over 2.5 goals has occurred in only 36% of their games. TransINVEST plays more openly, with at least 3 goals scored in 71% of its matches, but over its last five appearances it has averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.2 conceded. The visitors create quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.73 for the season and 2.10 over their last five matches, but their finishing efficiency is only 7%, with 1.0 goal scored per game. The projected total of 2.55 goals points to a realistic chance of two or three goals, while the four-goal threshold is clearly overpriced relative to Žalgiris’ defensive strength and scoring profile.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a TransINVEST Vilnius win, as Žalgiris were level at the break in 57% of their matches this season and in as many as 80% of their last five. The visitors score only 0.36 goals per match before half-time and failed to score in the first half in 71% of their appearances, while the hosts concede an average of 0.57 goals during this phase. After the break, TransINVEST improve their attacking output to 0.93 goals per match, rising to 1.20 over their last five games, giving them a genuine advantage after an even opening. The hosts have won 57% of their matches this season and average 1.93 goals, whereas Žalgiris ended without scoring in as many as 50% of their fixtures. Although the visitors’ defence is solid and keeps a clean sheet in 57% of matches, TransINVEST’s superior conversion rate—13% compared with 7%—supports a scenario in which the match is decided after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Žalgiris is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 2 pts / match - Žalgiris
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.66 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.52 goals / match - Žalgiris
Žalgiris is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.14 goals / match - Žalgiris
TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 86% of matches (25 of 29 matches), while Žalgiris keeps a clean sheet in 41% (12 of 29 matches).
Žalgiris scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - TransINVEST Vilnius
Over / Under - Žalgiris
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / match - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.34 pts / match - Žalgiris
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Žalgiris - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
TransINVEST Vilnius
Žalgiris
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Liga | Žalgiris | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.65 | • 2.66 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 48% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | • 31% | 32% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 69% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 77% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): TransINVEST Vilnius 2 - 0 - 1 Žalgiris. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris?
The A Lyga match finished TransINVEST Vilnius 3:0 Žalgiris. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between TransINVEST Vilnius and Žalgiris?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches TransINVEST Vilnius won 2, Žalgiris won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris?
TransINVEST Vilnius score 1.66 goals per game on average and Žalgiris 1.52. The A Lyga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 62% of TransINVEST Vilnius's matches and 45% of Žalgiris's.
What form are TransINVEST Vilnius and Žalgiris in?
Over the last 5 games TransINVEST Vilnius have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Žalgiris 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Žalgiris?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


