Tukums vs Rīgas FS: match statistics
Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tukums played Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 27 July 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Tukums: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Rīgas FS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tukums scores 1.65 and concedes 2.04 goals per match. Rīgas FS scores 2.39 and concedes 0.70. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tukums 91%, Rīgas FS 43%. Over 2.5: Tukums 78%, Rīgas FS 57%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.42. Tukums: 11.9 shots per match, Rīgas FS: 16.0.
Match halves
Tukums: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83. Rīgas FS: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.30.
Goals by minute
Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). Rīgas FS: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-6. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 83%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS are clear favorites: this season they have won 19 of 23 matches (19W, 2D, 2L) and scored 55 goals versus 38 by Tukums. In terms of chance quality the visitors have the edge — Rīgas’ away xG averages 2.01, while Tukums generate 1.39 xG at home, and xG against is 0.87 versus 1.61 respectively. Rīgas FS average 16.33 shots and 6.33 on target with 63% possession, whereas Tukums record 11.36 shots and 5.18 on target and 42% possession, which points to the visitors’ dominance in creating opportunities. The form gap is clear: Tukums have lost their last 5 matches, conceding 13 and scoring 6, while Rīgas FS have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 with an 8-2 goal record. Additionally, Rīgas FS concede only 0.67 goals away on average and have 58% of away games without conceding, compared to 1.45 goals conceded by Tukums at home and 9% clean sheets for the hosts; therefore I predict a win for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal stats indicate a moderate propensity for BTTS: Tukums has a season BTTS rate of 45% and Rīgas FS 42%, while the league BTTS rate is 56%. However, the last-5 profile is asymmetric: Tukums had BTTS in 100% of those matches and scored on average 1.2 goals while conceding 2.6 (6 for and 13 against), whereas Rīgas FS has only 40% BTTS in the last 5, scores 1.6 and concedes 0.4 on average (8 for and 2 against). Rīgas FS’s defense looks superior by season averages: Rīgas concedes 0.67 goals per game and has 58% clean sheets, while Tukums concedes 0.73 and has 45% clean sheets; this favors a clean sheet expected for the away side. Offensively both teams generate similar xG: Tukums xG 1.88 vs Rīgas 2.01, and shots on target 5.82 vs 6.33; despite higher conversion for Tukums (19% vs 11% for Rīgas), their poor form (Tukums 'lllll' vs Rīgas 'dwwww') reduces the chance of scoring against a strong away defense. Given Rīgas’s stronger defense and form and the low goals conceded (0.4) in their last 5 matches, I assign a higher probability to the 'No' (no BTTS) scenario — 65% No BTTS vs 35% BTTS (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
To assess expected goals I used each team’s average xG and xG conceded to the opponent: (1.88 + 0.87)/2 = 1.38 for Tukums and (2.01 + 0.91)/2 = 1.46 for Rīgas FS, totaling 2.84 expected goals. As hosts Tukums record 91% of season matches over 1.5 goals, Rīgas 58%, and the league average is 2.98 goals per match — a strong signal for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line Tukums have 64% of season matches above that threshold, Rīgas 50%, and league frequency of Over 2.5 is 55%, so I rate Over 2.5 as moderately likely. For 3.5 there is divergence: seasonally Tukums 64% vs Rīgas 17% (around 41% on average); additionally Rīgas conceded only 2 goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 avg) while Tukums conceded 13 (2.6 avg), which weakens the high-scoring scenario. Considering xG (1.88 vs 2.01) and form — Tukums on 5 straight losses, Rīgas 4 wins and a draw — the best and strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Rīgas FS leading at half-time with the visitors ultimately winning (HT/FT 2/2). Rīgas have a 92% win rate this season and were leading at the break in 58% of their matches, while Tukums have a 73% win rate and led at half-time in 55% of games, but recent form over the last five is divergent (Tukums: lllll, Rīgas: dwwww). xG favors the visitors (2.01 vs 1.88), and over the last five matches Rīgas conceded on average 0.4 goals versus 2.6 conceded by Tukums, indicating better defensive stability for the visitors. At half-time in the last five matches Rīgas conceded on average 0.2 goals and Tukums 0.8, which increases the likelihood of the visitors holding a lead at the break. However, Tukums have a higher shot conversion rate (19% vs 11%) and average 1.82 goals scored after the interval, so a turnaround is realistically possible; taking this into account I assign 38% to 2/2, 22% to X/2 and 8% to 2/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tukums | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 45% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Tukums · 2.39 goals / match - Rīgas FS
Rīgas FS is 191% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.04 goals / match - Tukums · 0.7 goals / match - Rīgas FS
Tukums scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 matches).
Rīgas FS scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tukums
Over / Under - Rīgas FS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Tukums · 2 pts / match - Rīgas FS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tukums - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tukums
Rīgas FS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Tukums | Liga | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.70 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 91% | 55% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 78% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 4% | 24% | ▲ 52% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 83% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Tukums 0 - 0 - 6 Rīgas FS. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 83% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tukums vs Rīgas FS?
The Virsliga match finished Tukums 0:1 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Rīgas FS?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, Rīgas FS won 6 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Rīgas FS?
Tukums score 1.65 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 2.39. The Virsliga average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 91% of Tukums's matches and 43% of Rīgas FS's.
What form are Tukums and Rīgas FS in?
Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Rīgas FS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Rīgas FS?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tukums vs Rīgas FS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


