United States - USL League OneData current as of 02 November 2026

Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics

Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Union Omaha played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 30 October 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Union Omaha: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Union Omaha scores 1.69 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.59 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Union Omaha 63%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 56%. Over 2.5: Union Omaha 56%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 56%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.46. Union Omaha: 15.3 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.3.

Match halves

Union Omaha: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.97. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Union Omaha: 76-90+ (19 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Union Omaha have a clear home advantage: they have won 69% of their home matches, while Chattanooga Red Wolves have lost 50% of their away games. The hosts average 2.06 goals and 6.44 shots on target per match at home, while the visitors score 1.31 goals and record 3.81 shots on target per game on the road. The difference in chance quality is reflected in Union Omaha’s home xG of 2.06, compared with Chattanooga’s away xG of 1.49. The defensive numbers also favour the hosts: they concede an average of 0.94 goals at home, while the visitors allow opponents 1.75 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in just 6% of games. Union Omaha have picked up 7 points in their last five matches, compared with Chattanooga’s 4, further strengthening the case for a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Union Omaha keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches, while Chattanooga Red Wolves fail to score in 25% of their games, increasing the risk of the visitors being held scoreless. Chattanooga have scored just 4 goals in their last 5 matches and recorded BTTS in only 20% of them, while Omaha have conceded an average of 1.0 goals. The visitors’ season BTTS rate of 69% and average xG of 1.49 support a both-teams-to-score scenario, so the edge for BTTS - No is not substantial. However, Omaha average 1.88 goals scored, and the visitors concede 1.75, making the more likely No BTTS outcome a home goal with Chattanooga failing to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Union Omaha average 1.88 goals per match, while Chattanooga Red Wolves concede 1.75, giving the hosts a solid basis for scoring. The visitors average 1.31 goals, although Union’s defense allows just 1.06, so their contribution to the forecast is smaller. At least two goals were scored in 63% of Union’s matches and 81% of Chattanooga’s, supporting the Over 1.5 goals pick. Both teams have scored less in their last five matches—1.2 and 0.8 goals per match, respectively—making the 2.5 line considerably less certain. With a forecast of 2.75 goals per match, Over 1.5 goals has the strongest backing, with an estimated probability of 76%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Union Omaha have posted stronger season results: they win 56% of their matches compared with 31% for Chattanooga Red Wolves, score an average of 1.88 goals, while the visitors concede 1.75. The most likely single scenario is the home side taking a lead at the break, having done so in 44% of their matches, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in 44% of theirs. This advantage is supported by first-half averages: Union score 0.88 goals, while Chattanooga concede 1.06. The hosts also average 1.00 goal after the break, increasing the likelihood of holding on to their lead through to full-time. However, the risk of a draw at half-time should be considered: Union were leading at the break only once in their last five matches, while Chattanooga were level three times, making X/1 a close alternative in the HT/FT market.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

78Possession (%)22
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
26Shots7
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
6Shots on target2
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
2.74xG0.79
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
14Corners0
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
95Dangerous attacks28
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
17Fouls23
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
2Cards3
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
1.69Goals scored / match1.59
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
1.06Goals conceded / match1.41
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
58%Average possession41%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
5.44Shots on target / match3.97
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.28Shots per match12.34
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
5.44Shots on target3.97
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
11%Shot conversion12.9%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
58%Possession41%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
1.83xG for1.46
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
1.29xG against1.65
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

Shooting quality

Union Omaha: DominantChattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attacking
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Union Omaha is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Union Omaha · 0.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Union Omaha
WWLLD
Season result split
59% W16% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
19-5-8
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chattanooga Red Wolves
LWLLD
Season result split
44% W16% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-13
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Union Omaha is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.69 goals / match - Union Omaha · 1.59 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Union Omaha is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Union Omaha · 1.41 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Union Omaha scoring profile: very strong

Union Omaha scores in 78% of matches (25 of 32 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).

54Goals scored (season)51
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
34Goals conceded (season)45
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
2.75Average goals in match3
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal81%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
63%2 goals47%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
22%3 goals19%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
3%4 goals9%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal75%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
25%2 goals38%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
0%3 goals22%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
0%4 goals3%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 32 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time28%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
38%Scored in both halves25%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
60%BTTS - last 520%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Union Omaha - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing
Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
34% leading31% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.34
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
0.66Goals scored (1st half)0.78
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.56
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
50%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
50%No goal before half-time47%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.69Points per match (2nd half)1.41
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
0.97Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.44
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves
38%No goal after half-time47%
Union OmahaChattanooga Red Wolves

Union Omaha - second-half results

44% W38% D19% L
42
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding211%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

38% W28% D34% L
43
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.34
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Union Omaha - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Union Omaha
ScoredConceded
11
5
0-15
7
5
16-30
5
8
31-45
5
6
46-60
7
5
61-75
19
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
8
11
0-15
7
4
16-30
10
10
31-45
12
7
46-60
4
5
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Union Omaha

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Union OmahaLigaChattanooga Red Wolves
Average goals in match▼ 2.752.99• 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 63%60%▼ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 56%60%▼ 56%
Clean sheets▼ 19%23%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▼ 72%75%▲ 81%
Goal after half-time• 81%81%• 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.75
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+40%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalPedro HernandezAssist: Yanis Lelin Vegas
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardOmar Gómez
  3. Union OmahaYellow cardLaurence Wootton
  4. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Joshua RamosOff: Dyson Clapier
  5. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Diego GutiérrezOff: Allen Gavilanes
  6. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardAaron Lombardi
  7. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardJames Vaughan
  8. Union OmahaYellow cardBrent Kallman
  9. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Blake MaloneOff: Brent Kallman
  10. Union OmahaSubstitutionOn: Brandon KnappOff: Pato Botello Faz
  11. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Jordan AyimbilaOff: Christian Engmann

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Union Omaha 3 - 1 - 0 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
1 : 3
Union Omaha
Union Omaha
2 : 0
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
0 : 3
Union Omaha
Union Omaha
2 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC

FAQ

What was the result of Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

The USL League One match finished Union Omaha 1:1 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Union Omaha and Chattanooga Red Wolves?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Union Omaha won 3, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

Union Omaha score 1.69 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.59. The USL League One average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Union Omaha's matches and 56% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.

What form are Union Omaha and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?

Over the last 5 games Union Omaha have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Union Omaha vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.