Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 22 October 2026

URA vs SC Villa: match statistics

URA crest
URA
0 : 0half-time 0:0
SC Villa crest
SC Villa
130%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

SC Villa shows significantly better form and league position (4th place) compared to URA (13th place). The visitors have an impressive record of 9 wins this season and have scored 24 goals, while the hosts have won only 2 matches and scored just 13 goals. The form in the last 5 matches clearly favors SC Villa (2.0 points per match, 9 goals) over URA (0.4 points per match, 0 goals). Particularly concerning is the fact that URA has not scored a single goal in their last 5 matches and has a 50% rate of matches without a goal scored at home. SC Villa demonstrates defensive solidity in away matches (43% clean sheets, on average 0.86 goals conceded) as well as offensive efficiency (1.14 goals per match away). Taking all statistics into account, SC Villa holds a clear advantage and is the favorite to secure a victory.

URA vs SC Villa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

URA played SC Villa in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 14 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

URA: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. SC Villa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

URA scores 0.87 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. SC Villa scores 1.60 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: URA 33%, SC Villa 47%. Over 2.5: URA 27%, SC Villa 47%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

URA has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.34. URA: 11.6 shots per match, SC Villa: 8.7.

Match halves

URA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. SC Villa: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

URA: 31-45+ (4 goals). SC Villa: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SC Villa shows significantly better form and league position (4th place) compared to URA (13th place). The visitors have an impressive record of 9 wins this season and have scored 24 goals, while the hosts have won only 2 matches and scored just 13 goals. The form in the last 5 matches clearly favors SC Villa (2.0 points per match, 9 goals) over URA (0.4 points per match, 0 goals). Particularly concerning is the fact that URA has not scored a single goal in their last 5 matches and has a 50% rate of matches without a goal scored at home. SC Villa demonstrates defensive solidity in away matches (43% clean sheets, on average 0.86 goals conceded) as well as offensive efficiency (1.14 goals per match away). Taking all statistics into account, SC Villa holds a clear advantage and is the favorite to secure a victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
URASC Villa
10Shots11
URASC Villa
1Shots on target3
URASC Villa
1.07xG1.44
URASC Villa
4Corners6
URASC Villa
51Dangerous attacks73
URASC Villa
14Fouls13
URASC Villa
0Cards0
URASC Villa

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.87Goals scored / match1.6
URASC Villa
1.13Goals conceded / match0.67
URASC Villa
52%Average possession49%
URASC Villa
4.6Shots on target / match3.2
URASC Villa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.6Shots per match8.73
URASC Villa
4.6Shots on target3.2
URASC Villa
7.5%Shot conversion18.3%
URASC Villa
52%Possession49%
URASC Villa
1.67xG for1.34
URASC Villa
1.48xG against1.24
URASC Villa

Shooting quality

URA: BalancedSC Villa: Efficient finishing
URASC Villa
Accuracy (shots on target)40%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SC Villa is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - URA · 2 pts / match - SC Villa

URA
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W47% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-7-6
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
SC Villa
WWLWD
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-3
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SC Villa is 84% better for: goals scored per match.

0.87 goals / match - URA · 1.6 goals / match - SC Villa

SC Villa is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - URA · 0.67 goals / match - SC Villa

URA scoring profile: more difficult

URA scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while SC Villa keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

SC Villa scoring profile: very strong

SC Villa scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

13Goals scored (season)24
URASC Villa
17Goals conceded (season)10
URASC Villa
2Average goals in match2.27
URASC Villa
0Goals scored (last 5)9
URASC Villa
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
URASC Villa

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal87%
URASC Villa
13%2 goals33%
URASC Villa
13%3 goals20%
URASC Villa
7%4 goals7%
URASC Villa

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal53%
URASC Villa
33%2 goals13%
URASC Villa
13%3 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%4 goals0%
URASC Villa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time0%
URASC Villa
7%BTTS in both halves0%
URASC Villa
13%Scored in both halves20%
URASC Villa

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
URASC Villa
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
URASC Villa
0%BTTS - last 540%
URASC Villa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
URASC Villa
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
URASC Villa
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
URASC Villa

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
URASC Villa
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
URASC Villa
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
URASC Villa

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SC Villa is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - URA · 1.4 pts / match - SC Villa

URA - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
SC Villa - half-time state
33% leading40% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.4
URASC Villa
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.6
URASC Villa
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
URASC Villa
0.87Average goals (1st half)0.87
URASC Villa
60%Clean sheet before half-time73%
URASC Villa
80%No goal before half-time67%
URASC Villa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.93
URASC Villa
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
URASC Villa
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
URASC Villa
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.27
URASC Villa
53%Clean sheet after half-time67%
URASC Villa
73%No goal after half-time33%
URASC Villa

URA - second-half results

20% W47% D33% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding65%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SC Villa - second-half results

47% W53% D0% L
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding182%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
SC Villa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.40
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

URA
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
3
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

SC Villa
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
5
0
46-60
7
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

SC Villa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
193%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
49%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaSC Villa
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.21• 2.27
Both teams scored▼ 33%42%▲ 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 27%39%▲ 47%
Clean sheets▼ 33%36%▲ 47%
Goal before half-time▼ 53%60%• 60%
Goal after half-time• 60%60%▲ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.21
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+66%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: URA 0 - 0 - 1 SC Villa. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of URA vs SC Villa?

The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:0 SC Villa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before URA vs SC Villa?

URA score 0.87 goals per game on average and SC Villa 1.60. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of URA's matches and 47% of SC Villa's.

What form are URA and SC Villa in?

Over the last 5 games URA have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and SC Villa 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs SC Villa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs SC Villa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.