Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 14 October 2026

UTS Rabat vs RSB Berkane: match statistics

UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
0 : 0half-time 0:0
RSB Berkane crest
RSB Berkane

UTS Rabat vs RSB Berkane: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UTS Rabat played RSB Berkane in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 8 October 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

UTS Rabat: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. RSB Berkane: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

UTS Rabat scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. RSB Berkane scores 0.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UTS Rabat 50%, RSB Berkane 0%. Over 2.5: UTS Rabat 50%, RSB Berkane 0%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

RSB Berkane has higher xG: 1.59 vs 0.70. UTS Rabat: 5.0 shots per match, RSB Berkane: 12.0.

Match halves

UTS Rabat: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00. RSB Berkane: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

UTS Rabat: 0-15 (1 goals). RSB Berkane: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

UTS Rabat have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals in the process, while RSB Berkane have recorded 2 wins and scored 8 goals. The home side won both of their previous league meetings, and average 2 goals per game at home, which supports backing them to win. However, they are not clear favourites: in their only away match, the visitors averaged 5 shots on target, compared with 2 for UTS at home, and registered an xG of 1.59 against UTS’s 0.76. Berkane also kept a clean sheet away from home and limited their opponents to chances worth just 0.39 xG, so the hosts may find it difficult to maintain their scoring rate. With so few home and away matches played, UTS’s stronger results justify backing the home side, but a draw or an away win remain realistic outcomes.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In their last 5 matches, BTTS landed in 60% of games for the two teams, slightly above the league average of 56%. UTS Rabat scored an average of 1.8 goals per match during this period, while RSB Berkane averaged 1.6, supporting the case for both sides to score. The visitors conceded an average of 1.0 goals, compared with 0.6 for the hosts, making UTS’s defence the main obstacle to this market. However, RSB Berkane have created chances worth 1.55 xG over their last 5 matches, compared with the hosts’ 0.88 xG, increasing the likelihood of breaking down that defence. Although the visitors’ current season data shows 0 goals scored and a 100% clean-sheet rate, their recent attacking form makes BTTS - Yes a slight favourite.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, UTS Rabat averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while RSB Berkane averaged 1.6 scored and 1.0 conceded, giving totals of 2.4 and 2.6 goals per match, respectively. Both teams went Over 2.5 goals in 60% of these matches, but their attacking xG figures were below their actual scoring output: 0.88 for the hosts and 1.55 for the visitors. This suggests caution about predicting a high-scoring game, despite the league average of 2.71 goals. With a projected total of 2.55 goals, the safest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this covers both tight matches with 2 or 3 goals and games with fewer goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

UTS Rabat have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals and conceding 0.6, while RSB Berkane have won 2 of 5, scoring 1.6 and conceding 1.0. The strongest signal concerns the start of the match: in the available sample of 3 games, the hosts led at the break every time, averaging 1.33 first-half goals and conceding none. The visitors were level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, and in their only game included in the season statistics, they also went into the break all square. Although Berkane created chances worth 1.59 xG in that match and have averaged 0.8 second-half goals in recent games, compared with 0.33 for UTS, a single match is too small a sample to outweigh the hosts’ stronger results. Therefore, UTS leading at the break and holding on until the final whistle is the most likely scenario, although the visitors’ greater strength after half-time increases the risk of a draw.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
6Shots10
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
2Shots on target1
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0.99xG1.43
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
5Corners2
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
64Dangerous attacks99
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
13Fouls15
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1Cards1
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0.5Goals conceded / match0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
34%Average possession65%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1.5Shots on target / match5
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5Shots per match12
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1.5Shots on target5
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
30%Shot conversion0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
34%Possession65%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0.7xG for1.59
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1.46xG against0.39
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: Counter-attackingRSB Berkane: Balanced
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
Accuracy (shots on target)30%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTS Rabat is 200% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1 pts / match - RSB Berkane

UTS Rabat
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 0.70Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
RSB Berkane
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 0.39BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat scoring profile: mixed

UTS Rabat scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while RSB Berkane keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

RSB Berkane scoring profile: more difficult

RSB Berkane scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1Goals conceded (season)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
2Average goals in match0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
3Goals scored (last 5)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1Goals conceded (last 5)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
50%2 goals0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%3 goals0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%2 goals0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%3 goals0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%BTTS in both halves0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%Scored in both halves0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
50%BTTS - last 50%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1 pts / match - RSB Berkane

UTS Rabat - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
RSB Berkane - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)1
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1.5Goals scored (1st half)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
1.5Average goals (1st half)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0%No goal before half-time100%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)1
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
0.5Average goals (2nd half)0
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
50%Clean sheet after half-time100%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane
100%No goal after half-time100%
UTS RabatRSB Berkane

UTS Rabat - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RSB Berkane - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.50
Goals scored / match1.50.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match1.50.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
RSB Berkane - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

RSB Berkane
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
37%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+450%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.96
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
28%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

RSB Berkane

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaRSB Berkane
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.71▼ 0.00
Both teams scored▼ 50%57%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 50%50%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▲ 50%25%▲ 100%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%71%▼ 0%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%79%▼ 0%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
0.93
Home goals / match
1.79
Away goals / match
+-48%
Home attack advantage
+-92%
Home defence advantage
+-43%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RSB BerkaneYellow cardYouness El Kaabi
  2. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Ayoub AjerrarOff: Samuel Tebily
  3. RSB BerkaneSubstitutionOn: Youssef MehriOff: Mohammed Amine Essahel
  4. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Omar ArjouneOff: Anas Nanah
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardAbdeljalil Chaynane
  6. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Mohamed FouzairOff: Imran Douieb

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): UTS Rabat 0 - 1 - 1 RSB Berkane. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

RSB Berkane
4 : 3
UTS Rabat
UTS Rabat
2 : 2
RSB Berkane

FAQ

What was the result of UTS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?

The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 0:0 RSB Berkane. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between UTS Rabat and RSB Berkane?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTS Rabat won 0, RSB Berkane won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?

UTS Rabat score 1.50 goals per game on average and RSB Berkane 0.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of UTS Rabat's matches and 0% of RSB Berkane's.

What form are UTS Rabat and RSB Berkane in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and RSB Berkane 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs RSB Berkane?

The statistical background for UTS Rabat vs RSB Berkane — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.