Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildOrigovöllurinnData current as of 13 September 2026

Valur vs Thór: match statistics

Valur crest
Valur
4 : 1half-time 1:1
Thór crest
Thór

Valur vs Thór: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Valur played Thór in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Origovöllurinn. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Valur: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Thór: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Valur scores 1.77 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. Thór scores 1.00 and concedes 2.27. League average: 3.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Valur 73%, Thór 50%. Over 2.5: Valur 73%, Thór 55%. League level: BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Valur has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.24. Valur: 15.4 shots per match, Thór: 11.4.

Match halves

Valur: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.91. Thór: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Valur: 76-90+ (12 goals). Thór: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.86 goals per match, BTTS 71%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Valur have a clear edge in chance creation at home, averaging 17.27 shots and 6.18 shots on target per match, compared with Thór’s away figures of just 10.91 shots and 3.18 on target. The hosts score 2.00 goals per home game and have failed to find the net in none of their matches, while the visitors average only 0.82 goals away from home and draw a blank in 45% of such fixtures. The difference is also reflected in the quality of chances created: Valur’s average xG stands at 1.99, compared with 1.19 for Thór. Both defences are vulnerable, with Valur conceding 2.45 goals per home match and Thór 2.73 away, but the visitors have lost as many as 64% of their away games. Although Valur have won only 1 of their last 5 matches, Thór’s poor finishing and -21 goal difference away from home support a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Valur’s season BTTS rate stands at 55%, while Thór’s is only 45%, and the visitors have failed to score in as many as 45% of their matches. Thór’s current form is particularly significant: BTTS - Yes occurred in just 20% of their last 5 games, with the team averaging only 0.8 goals scored. Valur have conceded heavily recently, averaging 2.8 goals per match and allowing opponents 2.58 xG, yet Thór’s attack generated only 1.37 xG during this period. The hosts should be able to exploit the visitors’ vulnerable defence, which concedes 2.73 goals per game over the season, but the greater risk is that Thór fail to find the net. Therefore, BTTS - No is marginally more likely, meaning that at least one team is expected to keep a clean sheet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Valur should create good scoring opportunities, as Thór concede an average of 2.73 goals per match and their average xG against is as high as 2.27. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored 1.6 goals and conceded 2.8, with at least 3 goals scored in 80% of those games. Thór score just 0.82 goals per match this season, but Valur’s defence concedes an average of 1.82 goals, meaning the visitors also have a realistic route to finding the net. The Over 1.5 goals line offers the greatest edge: it has landed in 64% of Valur’s matches and 73% of Thór’s, against a high league average of 3.86 goals per game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Valur has a clearer first-half profile: they led at the break in 27% of matches, compared with just 9% for Thór, while the visitors went into half-time trailing in as many as 73% of their games. The hosts average 0.45 goals before the break, whereas Thór concede as many as 1.36 goals per match during this period, reinforcing the scenario of an early Valur lead. Across the season, Valur win 36% of their matches compared with Thór’s 18%, while the away side allow opponents to score an average of 2.73 goals per game. Valur’s attack also records slightly higher average xG, 1.29 versus 1.19, while Thór’s defence is considerably weaker, with 2.27 xG against. The main risk lies in the hosts’ defence, which concedes an average of 1.82 goals, but Valur’s advantage in the opening phase and Thór’s poor away form make the HT/FT lead for the hosts and their eventual win the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
ValurThór
24Shots10
ValurThór
9Shots on target4
ValurThór
2.53xG1.21
ValurThór
6Corners4
ValurThór
57Dangerous attacks42
ValurThór
17Fouls9
ValurThór
1Cards1
ValurThór

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.77Goals scored / match1
ValurThór
2.05Goals conceded / match2.27
ValurThór
50%Average possession41%
ValurThór
5.73Shots on target / match3.36
ValurThór

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.45Shots per match11.36
ValurThór
5.73Shots on target3.36
ValurThór
11.5%Shot conversion8.8%
ValurThór
50%Possession41%
ValurThór
1.79xG for1.24
ValurThór
2.24xG against2.13
ValurThór

Shooting quality

Valur: AttackingThór: Balanced
ValurThór
Accuracy (shots on target)37%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Valur is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Valur · 1.2 pts / match - Thór

Valur
WDLDW
Season result split
36% W14% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-11
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.18Opponent xG: 2.19BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Thór
LLLWW
Season result split
27% W14% D59% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-13
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Valur is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

1.77 goals / match - Valur · 1 goals / match - Thór

Valur is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - Valur · 2.27 goals / match - Thór

Valur scoring profile: very strong

Valur scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 matches).

39Goals scored (season)22
ValurThór
45Goals conceded (season)50
ValurThór
3.82Average goals in match3.27
ValurThór
11Goals scored (last 5)4
ValurThór
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
ValurThór

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal68%
ValurThór
55%2 goals27%
ValurThór
27%3 goals5%
ValurThór
14%4 goals0%
ValurThór

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal77%
ValurThór
64%2 goals55%
ValurThór
32%3 goals41%
ValurThór
14%4 goals32%
ValurThór

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time14%
ValurThór
9%BTTS in both halves0%
ValurThór
41%Scored in both halves5%
ValurThór

BTTS and goal count

68%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
ValurThór
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
ValurThór
80%BTTS - last 520%
ValurThór

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
ValurThór
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
ValurThór
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
ValurThór

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
ValurThór
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
ValurThór
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
ValurThór

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Valur is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Valur · 0.82 pts / match - Thór

Valur - half-time state
32% leading36% draw32% trailing
Thór - half-time state
18% leading27% draw55% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)0.82
ValurThór
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.36
ValurThór
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.05
ValurThór
1.86Average goals (1st half)1.41
ValurThór
45%Clean sheet before half-time36%
ValurThór
36%No goal before half-time73%
ValurThór

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.14
ValurThór
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
ValurThór
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)1.23
ValurThór
1.95Average goals (2nd half)1.86
ValurThór
27%Clean sheet after half-time36%
ValurThór
41%No goal after half-time55%
ValurThór

Valur - second-half results

27% W32% D41% L
29
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Thór - second-half results

27% W32% D41% L
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Valur - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Thór - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Valur
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
8
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
5
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
12
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Thór
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
0
10
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Valur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.89
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ValurLigaThór
Average goals in match 3.823.86 3.27
Both teams scored 73%71% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%69% 55%
Clean sheets 9%16% 23%
Goal before half-time 86%82% 77%
Goal after half-time 86%86% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.86
Average goals per match
71%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.08
Home goals / match
1.77
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
39%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Valur 1 - 0 - 1 Thór. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Valur vs Thór?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Valur 4:1 Thór. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Valur and Thór?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Valur won 1, Thór won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Valur vs Thór?

Valur score 1.77 goals per game on average and Thór 1.00. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Valur's matches and 50% of Thór's.

What form are Valur and Thór in?

Over the last 5 games Valur have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Thór 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Valur vs Thór?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Valur vs Thór: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.