Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG: match statistics
Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wuhan Three Towns played Shanghai SIPG in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Venue: Wuhan Sports Center Stadium. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Wuhan Three Towns: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Shanghai SIPG: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.40 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Shanghai SIPG scores 1.57 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wuhan Three Towns 65%, Shanghai SIPG 71%. Over 2.5: Wuhan Three Towns 50%, Shanghai SIPG 62%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.35. Wuhan Three Towns: 12.1 shots per match, Shanghai SIPG: 11.3.
Match halves
Wuhan Three Towns: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.75. Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
Wuhan Three Towns: 31-45+ (8 goals). Shanghai SIPG: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wuhan Three Towns have a clear home advantage: they win 44% of their home matches, while Shanghai SIPG win just 27% of their away games and lose as many as 45%. The hosts create more chances, averaging 13.78 shots and 4.67 shots on target per match, compared with 8.09 shots and 3.18 on target for the visitors. Wuhan’s edge is also evident in chance quality: their average xG is 1.51, while opponents generate 1.31 xG at this stadium. By contrast, Shanghai average just 1.07 xG away from home and concede 1.47 xG. Both teams have identical records over their last five matches—2 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat—and have scored 8 goals each, so the outcome is far from certain. Nevertheless, the visitors’ weaker defence, which concedes an average of 1.64 goals away from home and keeps a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, points to a narrow Wuhan Three Towns victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is clear, as both teams frequently produce this scenario this season: Wuhan Three Towns in 70% of matches and Shanghai SIPG in 73%, compared with the league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 1.80 goals, with an xG of 1.74, while the visitors score 1.36 goals per match and face a Wuhan defence conceding an average of 1.10 goals. Wuhan should have particularly good conditions to find the net, as Shanghai SIPG concede an average of 1.64 goals, have kept a clean sheet in only 9% of matches, and allow opponents an xG of 1.47. Current form also supports goals at both ends: over their last 5 matches, each team has scored 1.6 goals and conceded 1.2, while BTTS landed in 60% of those games for both sides. The “Yes” pick is further strengthened by the fact that Wuhan average 4.7 shots on target per match compared with Shanghai’s 3.18, although the visitors make up for their lower number of chances with a high shot conversion rate of 17%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Wuhan Three Towns average 1.80 goals per match, while Shanghai SIPG concede 1.64, which clearly supports at least two goals in the game. The hosts also create more chances: their average xG stands at 1.74, with 14.8 shots and 4.7 shots on target per match, compared with the visitors’ 1.07 xG and 3.18 shots on target. In their last five matches, both teams scored 1.6 goals on average, while their games produced an average of 2.8 goals. The 1.5 line was covered in 90% of Wuhan’s matches and 73% of Shanghai SIPG’s, while both teams always exceeded the 0.5-goal threshold. Over 1.5 therefore has the strongest support from consistent scoring patterns and a projected 2.92 goals, whereas Over 2.5 remains a more moderate selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Wuhan Three Towns have a clearly stronger home profile, averaging 1.80 goals scored and 1.10 conceded, while Shanghai SIPG concede as many as 1.64 goals per away match. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with their average xG standing at 1.74 compared with 1.07 for the visitors, while the average number of shots on target is 4.7 to 3.18. In their last five matches, Wuhan have led at the break in 80% of games and conceded just 0.2 goals per match before half-time. Shanghai also tend to start cautiously, drawing at half-time in 64% of their matches this season, so the draw/hosts scenario remains a significant possibility. However, the strongest individual scenario is Wuhan leading at half-time and maintaining their winning result, particularly given that the hosts average 1.2 goals after the break, while the visitors concede 1.18 during this period.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wuhan Three Towns | Shanghai SIPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai SIPG is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.57 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG
Shanghai SIPG is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.38 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG
Wuhan Three Towns scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).
Shanghai SIPG scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wuhan Three Towns
Over / Under - Shanghai SIPG
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shanghai SIPG is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.38 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shanghai SIPG - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wuhan Three Towns
Shanghai SIPG
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Wuhan Three Towns | Liga | Shanghai SIPG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.15 | 3.04 | • 2.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 20% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 87% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Wuhan Three Towns 0 - 0 - 3 Shanghai SIPG. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG?
The Chinese Super League match finished Wuhan Three Towns 2:3 Shanghai SIPG. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Shanghai SIPG?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Wuhan Three Towns won 0, Shanghai SIPG won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG?
Wuhan Three Towns score 1.40 goals per game on average and Shanghai SIPG 1.57. The Chinese Super League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 71% of Shanghai SIPG's.
What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Shanghai SIPG in?
Over the last 5 games Wuhan Three Towns have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Shanghai SIPG 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG?
The statistical background for Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.