Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wuhan Three Towns play Shanghai SIPG in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 14 August 2026. Venue: Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.
Current form
Wuhan Three Towns: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Shanghai SIPG: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.40 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Shanghai SIPG scores 1.57 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wuhan Three Towns 65%, Shanghai SIPG 71%. Over 2.5: Wuhan Three Towns 50%, Shanghai SIPG 62%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.35. Wuhan Three Towns: 12.1 shots per match, Shanghai SIPG: 11.3.
Match halves
Wuhan Three Towns: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.75. Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
Wuhan Three Towns: 31-45+ (8 goals). Shanghai SIPG: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 33%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wuhan Three Towns | Shanghai SIPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai SIPG is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.57 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG
Shanghai SIPG is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.38 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG
Wuhan Three Towns scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).
Shanghai SIPG scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wuhan Three Towns
Over / Under - Shanghai SIPG
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shanghai SIPG is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns · 1.38 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shanghai SIPG - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wuhan Three Towns
Shanghai SIPG
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Wuhan Three Towns | Liga | Shanghai SIPG | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.15 | 3.04 | • 2.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 20% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 87% | • 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Wuhan Three Towns 0 - 0 - 3 Shanghai SIPG. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
When do Wuhan Three Towns and Shanghai SIPG play?
Wuhan Three Towns face Shanghai SIPG on 14 August 2026 in Chinese Super League at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Shanghai SIPG?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Wuhan Three Towns won 0, Shanghai SIPG won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG?
Wuhan Three Towns score 1.40 goals per game on average and Shanghai SIPG 1.57. The Chinese Super League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 71% of Shanghai SIPG's.
What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Shanghai SIPG in?
Over the last 5 games Wuhan Three Towns have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Shanghai SIPG 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG?
The statistical background for Wuhan Three Towns vs Shanghai SIPG — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.