Latvia - VirsligaĶekavas stadionsData current as of 02 November 2026

Auda vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
4 : 3half-time 2:1
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Auda vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Auda played FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 1 November 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 4:3.

Current form

Auda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. FS Jelgava: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 1.00 and concedes 1.68. League average: 2.90 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Auda 56%, FS Jelgava 41%. Over 2.5: Auda 50%, FS Jelgava 41%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.33. Auda: 14.4 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 11.1.

Match halves

Auda: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.91. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Auda: 31-45+ (14 goals). FS Jelgava: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 4-2-1. Average goals 2.57, BTTS 57%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda are the favourites: they sit 3rd in the table, while FS Jelgava are 7th, with season records of 20 wins and 7 losses, and 8 wins and 18 losses, respectively. In their last 5 matches, the hosts have won 3 times and scored 10 goals, while the visitors have failed to win, scoring just 2 goals and conceding 9. At home, Auda average 1.71 goals scored and 0.94 conceded, while Jelgava average 1.24 goals scored and 1.82 conceded away. The hosts’ advantage in chance quality is reflected in their home xG of 1.75, compared with the 1.83 xG conceded by the visitors away from home. Although Jelgava draw 35% of their away matches, Auda win 59% of their home games, and the teams’ current form points towards a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is FS Jelgava’s form: in their last 5 matches, the visitors scored an average of just 0.4 goals, and both teams scored in only 20% of those games. Across the season, Jelgava have failed to score in 41% of their matches, despite averaging 1.40 xG, suggesting their chances do not always translate into goals. Auda can exploit their opponents’ defensive weaknesses: they have recently averaged 2.0 goals from an xG of 2.06, while Jelgava have conceded 1.8 goals per match. The main argument against BTTS - No is that both teams scored in 80% of Auda’s last 5 matches. However, the visitors’ poor finishing makes it more likely that they will fail to score. BTTS - No means at least one team does not score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 82% of Auda’s matches and 59% of FS Jelgava’s games. Auda have averaged 2.0 goals per game over their last 5 matches, with an xG of 2.06, while Jelgava have scored just 0.4 goals per game over the same period. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 12% of their matches, so an away goal is possible, although Jelgava have failed to score in 41% of their games. The projected totals of 1.65 goals for Auda and 0.90 for Jelgava add up to 2.55, supporting the selected line more than Under 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is recent form: Auda have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals, while FS Jelgava have lost 4 of their last 5 and scored just 0.4 goals on average. The hosts led at the break in 40% of those matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goal before half-time, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in 40% and managed just 0.2 first-half goals on average. Auda’s post-break form also supports the prospect of them holding any lead: over their last 5 matches, they averaged 1.0 goal after the break, while Jelgava conceded 1.4. Across the season as a whole, the visitors have in fact scored more than the hosts—1.24 compared with 0.76 goals per match—which limits confidence in the prediction. Nevertheless, the clear gap in recent results and scoring effectiveness in both halves points to Auda leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
AudaFS Jelgava
29Shots9
AudaFS Jelgava
14Shots on target8
AudaFS Jelgava
3.65xG1.52
AudaFS Jelgava
6Corners1
AudaFS Jelgava
118Dangerous attacks53
AudaFS Jelgava
10Fouls13
AudaFS Jelgava
2Cards2
AudaFS Jelgava

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.68Goals scored / match1
AudaFS Jelgava
1.03Goals conceded / match1.68
AudaFS Jelgava
61%Average possession46%
AudaFS Jelgava
4.88Shots on target / match3.59
AudaFS Jelgava

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.41Shots per match11.09
AudaFS Jelgava
4.88Shots on target3.59
AudaFS Jelgava
11.6%Shot conversion9%
AudaFS Jelgava
61%Possession46%
AudaFS Jelgava
1.72xG for1.33
AudaFS Jelgava
1.08xG against1.74
AudaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Auda: DominantFS Jelgava: Balanced
AudaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)34%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 900% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Auda · 0.2 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Auda
WDWLW
Season result split
59% W21% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-7-7
1.97 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-4
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.06Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
FS Jelgava
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W24% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-18
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 68% better for: goals scored per match.

1.68 goals / match - Auda · 1 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Auda is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Auda · 1.68 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 91% of matches (31 of 34 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: mixed

FS Jelgava scores in 50% of matches (17 of 34 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).

57Goals scored (season)34
AudaFS Jelgava
35Goals conceded (season)57
AudaFS Jelgava
2.71Average goals in match2.68
AudaFS Jelgava
10Goals scored (last 5)2
AudaFS Jelgava
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
AudaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal50%
AudaFS Jelgava
44%2 goals26%
AudaFS Jelgava
18%3 goals12%
AudaFS Jelgava
6%4 goals9%
AudaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal85%
AudaFS Jelgava
29%2 goals35%
AudaFS Jelgava
9%3 goals21%
AudaFS Jelgava
3%4 goals12%
AudaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time15%
AudaFS Jelgava
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AudaFS Jelgava
29%Scored in both halves21%
AudaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
AudaFS Jelgava
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
AudaFS Jelgava
80%BTTS - last 520%
AudaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
AudaFS Jelgava
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
AudaFS Jelgava
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
AudaFS Jelgava

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
AudaFS Jelgava
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
AudaFS Jelgava
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
AudaFS Jelgava

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Auda · 1.18 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Auda - half-time state
41% leading32% draw26% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
29% leading29% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.18
AudaFS Jelgava
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AudaFS Jelgava
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
AudaFS Jelgava
1.32Average goals (1st half)1.18
AudaFS Jelgava
56%Clean sheet before half-time47%
AudaFS Jelgava
41%No goal before half-time62%
AudaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per match (2nd half)1
AudaFS Jelgava
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
AudaFS Jelgava
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)1
AudaFS Jelgava
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.5
AudaFS Jelgava
59%Clean sheet after half-time44%
AudaFS Jelgava
38%No goal after half-time68%
AudaFS Jelgava

Auda - second-half results

41% W44% D15% L
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

24% W29% D47% L
40
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 24%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Auda
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
8
6
16-30
14
10
31-45
11
6
46-60
7
4
61-75
13
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
9
16-30
5
5
31-45
4
9
46-60
7
9
61-75
6
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals in match▼ 2.712.90▼ 2.68
Both teams scored▲ 56%54%▼ 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%55%▼ 41%
Clean sheets▲ 38%26%▼ 15%
Goal before half-time▲ 79%74%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time▼ 76%81%▼ 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.90
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AudaYellow cardAriel Arroyo
  2. FS JelgavaYellow cardGlebs Žaleiko
  3. FS JelgavaGoalFilip Hašek
  4. AudaYellow cardAndrews Appiah
  5. FS JelgavaGoalTomas Rataj
  6. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Gļebs PatikaOff: Glebs Žaleiko
  7. FS JelgavaGoalFilip HašekAssist: Armands Pētersons
  8. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Andris DeklavsOff: Tomas Rataj

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Auda 4 - 2 - 1 FS Jelgava. Average goals 2.57, both teams scored in 57% matches.

FS Jelgava
0 : 1
Auda
Auda
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 3
Auda
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
3 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 4:3 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and FS Jelgava?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Auda won 4, FS Jelgava won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.57 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs FS Jelgava?

Auda score 1.68 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 1.00. The Virsliga average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Auda's matches and 41% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Auda and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and FS Jelgava 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs FS Jelgava?

The statistical background for Auda vs FS Jelgava — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.