Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: match statistics
Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cavalry FC played Pacific FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 17 October 2026. Venue: Spruce Meadows. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Cavalry FC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Pacific FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cavalry FC scores 2.04 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Pacific FC scores 1.15 and concedes 2.19. League average: 3.13 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cavalry FC 54%, Pacific FC 65%. Over 2.5: Cavalry FC 54%, Pacific FC 62%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.28. Cavalry FC: 15.0 shots per match, Pacific FC: 11.5.
Match halves
Cavalry FC: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.38. Pacific FC: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (16 goals). Pacific FC: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Canadian Premier League: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 5-1-1. Average goals 2.71, BTTS 29%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cavalry FC, the league leaders, are clear favourites against the side sitting eighth: they have won 75% of their home matches and have yet to lose one, while Pacific FC have won just 8% of their away games. The hosts average 2.5 goals scored and 0.58 conceded at home, compared with 1.23 scored and as many as 2.54 conceded by the visitors on the road. Cavalry’s advantage is also reflected in the quality of chances: their home xG stands at 1.87, against Pacific’s away xG of 1.04, while the visitors allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.74 xG. The hosts’ recent results are less convincing, however—they have won just once in their last five matches and conceded 9 goals—so a draw remains a realistic possibility. Pacific have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded 14 goals over that spell, which, despite Cavalry’s own poor run, points towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by the season-long rate of matches featuring goals from both teams: 69% for Cavalry FC and 62% for Pacific FC, compared with the league average of 63%. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in any of their matches and have conceded an average of 1.8 goals across their last five, giving the visitors a genuine chance of scoring. Pacific FC, meanwhile, have conceded an average of 2.8 goals per match recently, while Cavalry FC have scored 2.4, making a home goal look particularly likely. Caution is warranted, however, as Pacific FC have failed to score in 38% of their matches, and both teams scored in only 40% of their games over the last five. Despite this risk, the defensive frailties of both sides give BTTS - Yes a slightly stronger basis than BTTS - No, which means at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0-0 draw.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
At least 2 goals were scored in 77% of Cavalry FC matches and 92% of Pacific FC fixtures, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal in the data. The hosts have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches, while the visitors have conceded 14 over the same period, which points to goals for Cavalry. Pacific concede an average of 2.54 goals per match, compared with 1.85 for Cavalry, so both defences give opponents opportunities. The higher line is supported by 80% of Cavalry’s last five matches featuring at least 3 goals, but their season-wide rate stands at 54%, making Over 2.5 a less certain pick. A total-goals forecast of 3.15 supports Over 1.5 while also warranting greater caution on higher lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to Cavalry FC leading at the break and maintaining that advantage: in their last five matches, the hosts were ahead at half-time in 40% of games, while Pacific FC were trailing at that stage in 60%. Cavalry have recently averaged 2.4 goals per match, whereas Pacific have conceded 2.8, increasing the likelihood of a home lead. The difference after the break is just as clear: across their last five matches, Cavalry averaged 1.6 goals in the second half, while Pacific failed to score in that period. The 1/1 HT/FT pick nevertheless warrants caution, as Cavalry led at half-time in only 17% of matches across the season analysed. A half-time draw followed by a home win therefore remains a significant alternative.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cavalry FC | Pacific FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cavalry FC is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Cavalry FC · 0.8 pts / match - Pacific FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavalry FC is 77% better for: goals scored per match.
2.04 goals / match - Cavalry FC · 1.15 goals / match - Pacific FC
Cavalry FC is 170% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.81 goals / match - Cavalry FC · 2.19 goals / match - Pacific FC
Cavalry FC scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 26 matches).
Pacific FC scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cavalry FC
Over / Under - Pacific FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavalry FC is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - Cavalry FC · 1.27 pts / match - Pacific FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cavalry FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Pacific FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Cavalry FC | Liga | Pacific FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.85 | 3.13 | ▲ 3.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 63% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 59% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 20% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 83% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (7): Cavalry FC 5 - 1 - 1 Pacific FC. Average goals 2.71, both teams scored in 29% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished Cavalry FC 4:2 Pacific FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cavalry FC and Pacific FC?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Cavalry FC won 5, Pacific FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 29% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?
Cavalry FC score 2.04 goals per game on average and Pacific FC 1.15. The Canadian Premier League average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Cavalry FC's matches and 65% of Pacific FC's.
What form are Cavalry FC and Pacific FC in?
Over the last 5 games Cavalry FC have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pacific FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


