Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueSpruce MeadowsData current as of 18 October 2026

Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: match statistics

Cavalry FC crest
Cavalry FC
4 : 2half-time 3:2
Pacific FC crest
Pacific FC

Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cavalry FC played Pacific FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 17 October 2026. Venue: Spruce Meadows. Final score: 4:2.

Current form

Cavalry FC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Pacific FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cavalry FC scores 2.04 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Pacific FC scores 1.15 and concedes 2.19. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cavalry FC 54%, Pacific FC 65%. Over 2.5: Cavalry FC 54%, Pacific FC 62%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.28. Cavalry FC: 15.0 shots per match, Pacific FC: 11.5.

Match halves

Cavalry FC: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.38. Pacific FC: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (16 goals). Pacific FC: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Canadian Premier League: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 5-1-1. Average goals 2.71, BTTS 29%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cavalry FC, the league leaders, are clear favourites against the side sitting eighth: they have won 75% of their home matches and have yet to lose one, while Pacific FC have won just 8% of their away games. The hosts average 2.5 goals scored and 0.58 conceded at home, compared with 1.23 scored and as many as 2.54 conceded by the visitors on the road. Cavalry’s advantage is also reflected in the quality of chances: their home xG stands at 1.87, against Pacific’s away xG of 1.04, while the visitors allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.74 xG. The hosts’ recent results are less convincing, however—they have won just once in their last five matches and conceded 9 goals—so a draw remains a realistic possibility. Pacific have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded 14 goals over that spell, which, despite Cavalry’s own poor run, points towards a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by the season-long rate of matches featuring goals from both teams: 69% for Cavalry FC and 62% for Pacific FC, compared with the league average of 63%. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in any of their matches and have conceded an average of 1.8 goals across their last five, giving the visitors a genuine chance of scoring. Pacific FC, meanwhile, have conceded an average of 2.8 goals per match recently, while Cavalry FC have scored 2.4, making a home goal look particularly likely. Caution is warranted, however, as Pacific FC have failed to score in 38% of their matches, and both teams scored in only 40% of their games over the last five. Despite this risk, the defensive frailties of both sides give BTTS - Yes a slightly stronger basis than BTTS - No, which means at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least 2 goals were scored in 77% of Cavalry FC matches and 92% of Pacific FC fixtures, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal in the data. The hosts have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches, while the visitors have conceded 14 over the same period, which points to goals for Cavalry. Pacific concede an average of 2.54 goals per match, compared with 1.85 for Cavalry, so both defences give opponents opportunities. The higher line is supported by 80% of Cavalry’s last five matches featuring at least 3 goals, but their season-wide rate stands at 54%, making Over 2.5 a less certain pick. A total-goals forecast of 3.15 supports Over 1.5 while also warranting greater caution on higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Cavalry FC leading at the break and maintaining that advantage: in their last five matches, the hosts were ahead at half-time in 40% of games, while Pacific FC were trailing at that stage in 60%. Cavalry have recently averaged 2.4 goals per match, whereas Pacific have conceded 2.8, increasing the likelihood of a home lead. The difference after the break is just as clear: across their last five matches, Cavalry averaged 1.6 goals in the second half, while Pacific failed to score in that period. The 1/1 HT/FT pick nevertheless warrants caution, as Cavalry led at half-time in only 17% of matches across the season analysed. A half-time draw followed by a home win therefore remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Cavalry FCPacific FC
12Shots8
Cavalry FCPacific FC
5Shots on target3
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.26xG0.99
Cavalry FCPacific FC
4Corners2
Cavalry FCPacific FC
22Dangerous attacks36
Cavalry FCPacific FC
9Fouls20
Cavalry FCPacific FC
2Cards3
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cavalry FCPacific FC
2.04Goals scored / match1.15
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.81Goals conceded / match2.19
Cavalry FCPacific FC
49%Average possession51%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
5.31Shots on target / match3.65
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.96Shots per match11.46
Cavalry FCPacific FC
5.31Shots on target3.65
Cavalry FCPacific FC
13.6%Shot conversion10.1%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
49%Possession51%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.67xG for1.28
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.23xG against1.61
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Shooting quality

Cavalry FC: AttackingPacific FC: Balanced
Cavalry FCPacific FC
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cavalry FC is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Cavalry FC · 0.8 pts / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC
DWLLD
Season result split
62% W23% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-6-4
2.08 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Pacific FC
DWLLL
Season result split
8% W31% D62% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-8-16
0.54 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cavalry FC is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

2.04 goals / match - Cavalry FC · 1.15 goals / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC is 170% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Cavalry FC · 2.19 goals / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC scoring profile: very strong

Cavalry FC scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 26 matches).

Pacific FC scoring profile: strong

Pacific FC scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

53Goals scored (season)30
Cavalry FCPacific FC
21Goals conceded (season)57
Cavalry FCPacific FC
2.85Average goals in match3.35
Cavalry FCPacific FC
12Goals scored (last 5)5
Cavalry FCPacific FC
9Goals conceded (last 5)14
Cavalry FCPacific FC

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal65%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
58%2 goals31%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
31%3 goals12%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
12%4 goals8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal96%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
12%2 goals69%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
8%3 goals38%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0%4 goals8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time15%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
4%BTTS in both halves8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
35%Scored in both halves19%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
80%BTTS - last 540%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cavalry FC is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Cavalry FC · 1.27 pts / match - Pacific FC

Cavalry FC - half-time state
35% leading58% draw8% trailing
Pacific FC - half-time state
31% leading35% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.27
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.12
Cavalry FCPacific FC
81%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
58%No goal before half-time58%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.81Points per match (2nd half)0.42
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
Cavalry FCPacific FC
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)1.54
Cavalry FCPacific FC
1.96Average goals (2nd half)2.12
Cavalry FCPacific FC
50%Clean sheet after half-time15%
Cavalry FCPacific FC
19%No goal after half-time62%
Cavalry FCPacific FC

Cavalry FC - second-half results

46% W42% D12% L
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pacific FC - second-half results

4% W31% D65% L
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-25
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding26%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cavalry FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Pacific FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.41.4
Average goals in match2.41.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-2-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cavalry FC
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
6
2
16-30
5
1
31-45
9
3
46-60
11
5
61-75
16
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Pacific FC
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
1
4
16-30
10
7
31-45
6
15
46-60
4
7
61-75
5
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cavalry FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.79
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Pacific FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Cavalry FCLigaPacific FC
Average goals in match▼ 2.853.13▲ 3.35
Both teams scored▼ 54%63%▲ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 54%59%▲ 62%
Clean sheets▲ 38%20%▼ 4%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%67%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%83%▲ 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Cavalry FC 5 - 1 - 1 Pacific FC. Average goals 2.71, both teams scored in 29% matches.

Pacific FC
0 : 1
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
3 : 0
Pacific FC
Pacific FC
1 : 2
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
3 : 3
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
1 : 0
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
1 : 0
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
4 : 0
Pacific FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished Cavalry FC 4:2 Pacific FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cavalry FC and Pacific FC?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Cavalry FC won 5, Pacific FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 29% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

Cavalry FC score 2.04 goals per game on average and Pacific FC 1.15. The Canadian Premier League average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Cavalry FC's matches and 65% of Pacific FC's.

What form are Cavalry FC and Pacific FC in?

Over the last 5 games Cavalry FC have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pacific FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavalry FC vs Pacific FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.