Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics
Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pacific FC played Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Westhills Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Pacific FC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Cavalry FC: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pacific FC scores 1.25 and concedes 2.10 goals per match. Cavalry FC scores 2.00 and concedes 0.60. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pacific FC 75%, Cavalry FC 50%. Over 2.5: Pacific FC 65%, Cavalry FC 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.41. Pacific FC: 11.9 shots per match, Cavalry FC: 14.4.
Match halves
Pacific FC: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.75. Cavalry FC: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.35.
Goals by minute
Pacific FC: 31-45+ (6 goals). Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Canadian Premier League: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cavalry FC sit top of the table, having won 14 of their 20 matches this season, and remain unbeaten in their last five games, with a record of 4 wins and 1 draw. Pacific FC have just 1 win in the entire competition, have lost 70% of their home matches, and have failed to keep a single clean sheet. The hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals per home game, while Cavalry allow opponents just 0.6 goals away from home and keep a clean sheet in 40% of their away fixtures. The visitors are also more clinical, scoring 1.7 goals per away game with a 14% shot conversion rate, compared with Pacific’s 1.3 goals and 10% conversion rate. Although Pacific produce a slightly higher average xG at home, 1.62 compared with 1.35, their extremely vulnerable defence and Cavalry’s significantly stronger recent form clearly point towards a victory for the league leaders.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for goals from both sides is strengthened by current form: BTTS has landed in 60% of Pacific FC’s last five matches and in as many as 80% of Cavalry FC’s games. During this period, Pacific conceded an average of 1.4 goals per match, while their average xG against stood at 1.39, giving an in-form Cavalry, who have recently scored 2.0 goals per game, a solid foundation to find the net. The hosts have not recorded a single scoreless game this season, and their attacking potential is confirmed by an average of 2.3 goals, an xG of 1.90, and 6.3 shots on target per match. The main risk to the pick is Cavalry’s solid defense, which concedes just 0.6 goals on average and keeps a clean sheet in 40% of matches. However, Pacific create enough chances to make the BTTS scenario slightly more likely than at least one team failing to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Pacific FC create chances worth an average of 1.90 xG at home and register 17.0 shots per match, while Cavalry FC record 1.35 xG in attack. Both teams have very solid defenses, conceding an average of 0.6 goals each; however, in their last five matches, Pacific conceded 1.4 goals per game, while Cavalry scored as many as 2.0. The Over 1.5 line has landed in 90% of Pacific FC matches and 60% of Cavalry FC matches, while at least one goal was scored in 100% and 90% of their games, respectively. The projected 2.60 goals and the visitors’ strong current attacking form support Over 1.5, although the high percentage of matches finishing below 3.5 goals—70% and 80%—limits the potential for a very high-scoring game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams have been level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, while each has averaged just 0.8 goals before the break. Pacific retains the home advantage in the season data, with an average xG of 1.90 compared with Cavalry’s 1.35, but its current form has clearly declined: it has recently scored 1.2 goals and conceded 1.4 per match. Cavalry has won 4 of its last 5 matches, scoring 2.0 goals per game during this period and allowing opponents just 0.8. After the break, the visitors have recently averaged 1.6 goals, while Pacific has conceded 1.2 in second halves, reinforcing the HT/FT X/2 scenario—a turnaround from a half-time draw to a Cavalry win at the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pacific FC | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cavalry FC is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Pacific FC · 2.6 pts / match - Cavalry FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavalry FC is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Pacific FC · 2 goals / match - Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC is 250% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.1 goals / match - Pacific FC · 0.6 goals / match - Cavalry FC
Pacific FC scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).
Cavalry FC scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pacific FC
Over / Under - Cavalry FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavalry FC is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / match - Pacific FC · 1.65 pts / match - Cavalry FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pacific FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 5%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cavalry FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pacific FC | Liga | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.35 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 65% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 20% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▼ 45% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 83% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Pacific FC 1 - 1 - 4 Cavalry FC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished Pacific FC 0:1 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Pacific FC and Cavalry FC?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Pacific FC won 1, Cavalry FC won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?
Pacific FC score 1.25 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 2.00. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Pacific FC's matches and 50% of Cavalry FC's.
What form are Pacific FC and Cavalry FC in?
Over the last 5 games Pacific FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Cavalry FC 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?
The statistical background for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


