El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 07 September 2026

CD Platense vs Firpo: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Firpo crest
Firpo

CD Platense vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense played Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

CD Platense: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Firpo: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.27 and concedes 1.51 goals per match. Firpo scores 2.05 and concedes 1.02. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 59%, Firpo 56%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 46%, Firpo 58%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.22. CD Platense: 8.3 shots per match, Firpo: 11.3.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.71. Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.37.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 31-45+ (11 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (25 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-4. Average goals 3.60, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Firpo is the clear favorite: the visitors have 29 wins this season versus 8 for Platense and have scored 88 goals versus 52, indicating a significant advantage in attack. Away, Firpo averages 2.43 goals per game with an average xG of 1.53 and 4.62 shots on target, while Platense at home averages 1.29 goals, xG 1.32 and 3.67 shots on target. Efficiency favors Firpo — conversion rate 25% versus 14% for the hosts and a percentage of clean-sheet matches 10% versus 24% indicate the visitors convert chances into goals more often. Form confirms this: Firpo has won 5 of their last 5 matches, collecting 15 points, whereas Platense has 3 points from their last 5 (0 wins), and Platense draws 48% of home matches. Defensively both teams concede an average of 1.33 goals per game, so the decisive factor will be Firpo’s superior attacking quality and efficiency; therefore I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I favor BTTS = 'Yes' and estimate its probability at about 70% versus 30% for 'No'. The key signal comes from Firpo: as the away side they have a seasonal BTTS of 76% and score on average 2.43 goals per match; in their last 5 matches they scored 11 goals (2.2 per match) and conceded only 2 (0.4 per match), with form of 5 wins. Platense theoretically defend well at home (55% clean sheets and seasonal BTTS only 36%, conceding 0.73 goals seasonally), but in their last 5 home games they conceded 9 and scored 5 (1.8 and 1.0 per match), which weakens that argument. Additionally, Firpo have a very high shot conversion rate of 25% versus Platense's 13% and xG_for 1.53 compared to Platense's xG_against 1.15, suggesting the visitors efficiently convert chances into goals. Considering Firpo's dominant form and Platense's recently deteriorated defense, the both teams to score scenario is the strongest signal from the data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Calculated xG yields a total of approximately 2.96: CD Platense has xG_for 1.99 and away xG_against 1.24 → expected home goals ≈1.62, Firpo has xG_for 1.53 and home xG_against 1.15 → expected away goals ≈1.34. Additionally, Firpo averages 2.43 goals scored per game, while Platense concedes only 0.73 goals at home on average, which amplifies the chance of away goals. Season-to-date, the rate of matches over 1.5 goals is 64% for Platense and 95% for Firpo, and a Poisson model with lambda=2.96 gives ~79.5% probability of >1.5 goals, so I assess Over 1.5 at about 80%. For 2.5, season rates are 41%/76% and the model probability is ~56.8% for ≥3 goals, therefore I estimate Over 2.5 at ~57%. The 3.5 line is least likely (season rates 23%/62% and ~34.5% model probability for 4+ goals), so I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Firpo victory at full-time (X/2). Platense drew at the break in 59% of home matches and only led at the break in 23% of games, scoring an average of 0.41 first-half goals versus Firpo's 0.95. Firpo is clearly in better form — winning 5 of their last 5 matches (100% over the last 5), averaging 2.43 goals per match this season and securing 67% of seasonal wins, whereas Platense have not won any of their last 5 (0%). Although Platense’s xG is higher (1.99 vs 1.53 for Firpo), Firpo converts chances more effectively (shot conversion rate 25% versus 13%), which increases their likelihood of scoring decisive goals in the second half. Therefore, I expect the game to remain level at half-time, with Firpo using their form and efficiency to turn the match in their favor by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
CD PlatenseFirpo
4Shots5
CD PlatenseFirpo
1Shots on target2
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.86xG0.89
CD PlatenseFirpo
5Corners2
CD PlatenseFirpo
73Dangerous attacks58
CD PlatenseFirpo
-1Fouls-1
CD PlatenseFirpo
-1Cards-1
CD PlatenseFirpo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match2.05
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.51Goals conceded / match1.02
CD PlatenseFirpo
47%Average possession52%
CD PlatenseFirpo
3.63Shots on target / match5.19
CD PlatenseFirpo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.27Shots per match11.33
CD PlatenseFirpo
3.63Shots on target5.19
CD PlatenseFirpo
15.3%Shot conversion18.1%
CD PlatenseFirpo
47%Possession52%
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.22xG for1.76
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.34xG against1.19
CD PlatenseFirpo

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Counter-attackingFirpo: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)44%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - CD Platense · 3 pts / match - Firpo

CD Platense
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W41% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-17-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-10-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Firpo
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
67% W19% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
29-8-6
2.21 pts / match · goal difference +44
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
14-3-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - CD Platense · 2.05 goals / match - Firpo

Firpo is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.51 goals / match - CD Platense · 1.02 goals / match - Firpo

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 68% of matches (28 of 41 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 35% (15 of 43 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 84% of matches (36 of 43 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 22% (9 of 41 matches).

52Goals scored (season)88
CD PlatenseFirpo
62Goals conceded (season)44
CD PlatenseFirpo
2.78Average goals in match3.07
CD PlatenseFirpo
5Goals scored (last 5)11
CD PlatenseFirpo
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
CD PlatenseFirpo

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal84%
CD PlatenseFirpo
34%2 goals63%
CD PlatenseFirpo
20%3 goals47%
CD PlatenseFirpo
5%4 goals7%
CD PlatenseFirpo

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal65%
CD PlatenseFirpo
39%2 goals26%
CD PlatenseFirpo
22%3 goals7%
CD PlatenseFirpo
7%4 goals2%
CD PlatenseFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time19%
CD PlatenseFirpo
7%BTTS in both halves7%
CD PlatenseFirpo
17%Scored in both halves44%
CD PlatenseFirpo

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS49%
CD PlatenseFirpo
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
CD PlatenseFirpo
60%BTTS - last 540%
CD PlatenseFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
CD PlatenseFirpo
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
CD PlatenseFirpo
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
CD PlatenseFirpo

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
CD PlatenseFirpo
51%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
CD PlatenseFirpo
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
CD PlatenseFirpo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.47 pts / match - Firpo

CD Platense - half-time state
22% leading49% draw29% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
35% leading42% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.47
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.67
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.51
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.19
CD PlatenseFirpo
51%Clean sheet before half-time65%
CD PlatenseFirpo
61%No goal before half-time51%
CD PlatenseFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)2.35
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1.37
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.51
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.88
CD PlatenseFirpo
44%Clean sheet after half-time60%
CD PlatenseFirpo
54%No goal after half-time21%
CD PlatenseFirpo

CD Platense - second-half results

15% W49% R37% P
47
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Firpo - second-half results

72% W19% R9% P
63
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
101
Second-half points
+37
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding191%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
7
16-30
11
10
31-45
9
9
46-60
11
14
61-75
9
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
11
6
0-15
8
8
16-30
10
8
31-45
13
9
46-60
25
7
61-75
21
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (25 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaFirpo
Average goals in match 2.782.71 3.07
Both teams scored 59%54% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%51% 58%
Clean sheets 22%27% 35%
Goal before half-time 68%67% 65%
Goal after half-time 71%78% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Cristian David Gil Hurtado⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FirpoGoalCristian David Gil Hurtado

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jesús AguirreMatches officiated: 14
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 243%Home wins21%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): CD Platense 0 - 1 - 4 Firpo. Average goals 3.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Firpo
3 : 1
CD Platense
Firpo
6 : 2
CD Platense
CD Platense
0 : 2
Firpo
CD Platense
1 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
0 : 0
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Firpo?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:1 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Firpo?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, Firpo won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Firpo?

CD Platense score 1.27 goals per game on average and Firpo 2.05. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 59% of CD Platense's matches and 56% of Firpo's.

What form are CD Platense and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Firpo 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Firpo?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Firpo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.