FS Jelgava vs Super Nova: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
FS Jelgava vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
FS Jelgava play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 5 September 2026. Venue: Zemgales Olimpiskā centra.
Current form
FS Jelgava: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Super Nova: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
FS Jelgava scores 1.14 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.04 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: FS Jelgava 46%, Super Nova 62%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 43%, Super Nova 54%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
FS Jelgava has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.18. FS Jelgava: 11.3 shots per match, Super Nova: 9.1.
Match halves
FS Jelgava: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.57. Super Nova: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
FS Jelgava: 61-75 (7 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 4-3-0. Average goals 2.14, BTTS 57%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| FS Jelgava | Super Nova | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FS Jelgava is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1 pts / match - Super Nova
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FS Jelgava is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.04 goals / match - Super Nova
Super Nova is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.68 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.46 goals / match - Super Nova
FS Jelgava scores in 57% of matches (16 of 28 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
Super Nova scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FS Jelgava
Over / Under - Super Nova
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FS Jelgava is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.08 pts / match - Super Nova
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FS Jelgava - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Super Nova - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
FS Jelgava
Super Nova
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| FS Jelgava | Liga | Super Nova | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.82 | 3.00 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 55% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 56% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 24% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 76% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 82% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (7): FS Jelgava 4 - 3 - 0 Super Nova. Average goals 2.14, both teams scored in 57% matches.
FAQ
When do FS Jelgava and Super Nova play?
FS Jelgava face Super Nova on 5 September 2026 in Virsliga at Zemgales Olimpiskā centra. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Super Nova?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 4, Super Nova won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.14 goals, with both teams scoring in 57% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?
FS Jelgava score 1.14 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.04. The Virsliga average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 46% of FS Jelgava's matches and 62% of Super Nova's.
What form are FS Jelgava and Super Nova in?
Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Super Nova 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.