Latvia - VirsligaStadions DaugavaData current as of 15 October 2026

Liepāja vs Auda: match statistics

Liepāja crest
Liepāja
2 : 3half-time 1:0
Auda crest
Auda

Liepāja vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Liepāja played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 12 October 2026. Venue: Stadions Daugava. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Liepāja: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Auda: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Liepāja scores 1.32 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Auda scores 1.58 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Liepāja 55%, Auda 52%. Over 2.5: Liepāja 58%, Auda 45%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.55. Liepāja: 13.2 shots per match, Auda: 14.1.

Match halves

Liepāja: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.71. Auda: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.84.

Goals by minute

Liepāja: 76-90+ (11 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-4. Average goals 2.29, BTTS 43%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda have a slight edge: they sit 3rd in the table and have won 18 of 31 matches, while fourth-placed Liepāja have recorded 12 victories. The visitors are unbeaten in their last 5 games, with 2 wins and 3 draws; during the same period, the hosts have won once, drawn 3 times and lost once. Liepāja’s home scoring record works in their favour, averaging 1.86 goals per match compared with Auda’s 1.43 away from home, while both teams concede an average of 1 goal in these conditions. However, the quality of chances created and defensive performance point to the visitors: their away xG is 1.60, compared with 1.41 for the hosts at home, while their respective xG conceded figures are 0.99 and 1.52. On balance, Auda are slight favourites, although 29% of their away matches have ended in a draw, so a share of the points remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS landed in 47% of Liepāja’s matches and 57% of Auda’s, giving a slight edge to the scenario in which both teams score. Both sides create chances regularly: average xG stands at 1.75 for the hosts and 1.60 for the visitors, while 12% and 7% of their matches, respectively, ended without them scoring. However, solid defending argues for caution: Liepāja kept a clean sheet in 41% of matches, compared with 43% for Auda. In their last five matches, both teams conceded an average of 1.0 goals, while their BTTS rates were 40% and 60%. Therefore, BTTS - Yes has a slight edge, but the high clean-sheet rates mean it cannot be considered a clear favorite.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line was not exceeded in 82% of Liepāja’s matches and 79% of Auda’s. Although the teams average 1.71 and 1.43 goals scored per game this season, they concede relatively few—0.94 and 1.00 per match, respectively. Their last five matches produced averages of 2.0 and 2.4 total goals, with Over 2.5 goals landing in 40% of each team’s games. The forecast of 2.45 total goals therefore supports Under 3.5, which offers a clearer edge than the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time appears most likely: Liepāja were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while both teams averaged just 0.4 goals before half-time over this period. Across the season, Auda went into half-time level in 50% of their away matches, further supporting this scenario. After the break, the stronger signal comes from the visitors: they won the second half 3 times in their last 5 matches, compared with just once for Liepāja, and averaged 1.0 goals in the second half against the hosts’ 0.6. Auda have lost none of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.8 points per game in that run, compared with Liepāja’s 1.2. Therefore, my HT/FT pick is a draw at half-time and an Auda win at full-time, although the fact that both teams drew 60% of their last 5 matches makes a full-time draw a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
LiepājaAuda
7Shots18
LiepājaAuda
4Shots on target8
LiepājaAuda
0.99xG2.21
LiepājaAuda
3Corners1
LiepājaAuda
35Dangerous attacks71
LiepājaAuda
15Fouls18
LiepājaAuda
1Cards2
LiepājaAuda

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.32Goals scored / match1.58
LiepājaAuda
1.39Goals conceded / match0.97
LiepājaAuda
51%Average possession61%
LiepājaAuda
4.45Shots on target / match4.65
LiepājaAuda

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.23Shots per match14.06
LiepājaAuda
4.45Shots on target4.65
LiepājaAuda
10%Shot conversion11.2%
LiepājaAuda
51%Possession61%
LiepājaAuda
1.55xG for1.68
LiepājaAuda
1.52xG against1.09
LiepājaAuda

Shooting quality

Liepāja: BalancedAuda: Dominant
LiepājaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Liepāja · 1.8 pts / match - Auda

Liepāja
LWDDD
Season result split
39% W23% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-7-12
1.39 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Auda
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
58% W23% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
18-7-6
1.97 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-4-2
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.05Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.32 goals / match - Liepāja · 1.58 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.39 goals / match - Liepāja · 0.97 goals / match - Auda

Liepāja scoring profile: strong

Liepāja scores in 68% of matches (21 of 31 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 42% (13 of 31 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 90% of matches (28 of 31 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 31 matches).

41Goals scored (season)49
LiepājaAuda
43Goals conceded (season)30
LiepājaAuda
2.71Average goals in match2.55
LiepājaAuda
5Goals scored (last 5)6
LiepājaAuda
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
LiepājaAuda

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal90%
LiepājaAuda
42%2 goals42%
LiepājaAuda
16%3 goals13%
LiepājaAuda
6%4 goals3%
LiepājaAuda

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal58%
LiepājaAuda
35%2 goals26%
LiepājaAuda
13%3 goals10%
LiepājaAuda
6%4 goals3%
LiepājaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time23%
LiepājaAuda
3%BTTS in both halves0%
LiepājaAuda
23%Scored in both halves29%
LiepājaAuda

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
LiepājaAuda
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
LiepājaAuda
40%BTTS - last 560%
LiepājaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
LiepājaAuda
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
LiepājaAuda
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
LiepājaAuda

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
LiepājaAuda
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
LiepājaAuda
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
LiepājaAuda

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Liepāja · 1.61 pts / match - Auda

Liepāja - half-time state
35% leading23% draw42% trailing
Auda - half-time state
42% leading35% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.61
LiepājaAuda
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.74
LiepājaAuda
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
LiepājaAuda
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.26
LiepājaAuda
48%Clean sheet before half-time61%
LiepājaAuda
61%No goal before half-time39%
LiepājaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.61
LiepājaAuda
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
LiepājaAuda
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
LiepājaAuda
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.29
LiepājaAuda
39%Clean sheet after half-time61%
LiepājaAuda
48%No goal after half-time42%
LiepājaAuda

Liepāja - second-half results

32% W35% D32% L
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - second-half results

39% W45% D16% L
50
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
7
8
0-15
4
6
16-30
8
7
31-45
9
7
46-60
2
4
61-75
11
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Auda
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
8
5
16-30
11
8
31-45
9
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

LiepājaLigaAuda
Average goals in match▼ 2.712.86▼ 2.55
Both teams scored• 55%54%▼ 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 58%53%▼ 45%
Clean sheets▼ 19%25%▲ 42%
Goal before half-time▲ 81%74%▲ 77%
Goal after half-time• 81%80%▼ 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AudaSubstitutionOn: Jayen GeroldOff: Barthélémy Diedhiou
  2. AudaSubstitutionOn: Wally FofanaOff: Edvin Bongemba
  3. LiepājaYellow cardBart Straalman
  4. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Kirils IljinsOff: Andrii Korobenko
  5. AudaYellow cardRalfs Kragliks
  6. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Bruno MelnisOff: Danila Patijčuks
  7. AudaGoalJayen GeroldAssist: Wally Fofana

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Liepāja 2 - 1 - 4 Auda. Average goals 2.29, both teams scored in 43% matches.

Auda
1 : 0
Liepāja
Auda
3 : 1
Liepāja
Liepāja
1 : 2
Auda
FK Auda Riga
1 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Liepāja
0 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
3 : 0
FK Liepāja

FAQ

What was the result of Liepāja vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 2:3 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and Auda?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 2, Auda won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.29 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs Auda?

Liepāja score 1.32 goals per game on average and Auda 1.58. The Virsliga average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Liepāja's matches and 52% of Auda's.

What form are Liepāja and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Auda 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs Auda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Liepāja vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.