Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 21 October 2026

URA vs SC Villa: match statistics

URA crest
URA
0 : 1half-time 0:1
SC Villa crest
SC Villa

URA vs SC Villa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

URA played SC Villa in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

URA: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. SC Villa: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

URA scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. SC Villa scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: URA 100%, SC Villa 100%. Over 2.5: URA 100%, SC Villa 0%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

URA has higher xG: 0.99 vs 0.98. URA: 4.0 shots per match, SC Villa: 6.0.

Match halves

URA: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 2.00. SC Villa: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

URA: 76-90+ (2 goals). SC Villa: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.20 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SC Villa sit 9th, while URA are 13th, and also boast a clearly better record in their last five matches: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat compared with URA’s 1 win and as many as 4 draws. The visitors have scored 9 goals during this period, averaging 1.8 per match, compared with URA’s 7 goals, while their points tally stands at 2.0 per game versus 1.4 for the hosts. URA are solid defensively, however, conceding just 4 goals in five matches, which makes a draw a realistic outcome. SC Villa’s defence is not flawless either, having conceded 5 goals over the same period, but their greater attacking efficiency and three wins in five appearances favour the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The latest form of both teams favors goals at both ends: URA have averaged 1.4 goals per match, while SC Villa have averaged 1.8 in their last five fixtures. Over the same period, the hosts conceded 0.8 goals per match and the visitors 1.0, creating a realistic path to a goal for either side. Their attacking potential is also supported by the average xG figures: 1.62 for URA and 1.43 for SC Villa, both higher than the respective 1.01 and 1.27 xG allowed by their opponents. BTTS - Yes landed in 60% of URA’s last five matches and as many as 80% of SC Villa’s, meaning the current data is clearly stronger than the low league-wide rate of 28%. Given the limited seasonal sample, BTTS - Yes has the edge, but it is not a risk-free signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams points to a match with goals, but without clear indications of a high-scoring game: URA averaged 1.4 goals in their last 5 matches, while SC Villa averaged 1.8. At the same time, both defences conceded relatively few goals—0.8 and 1.0 per match, respectively—which limits the projection to around 2.33 goals. The chance-quality metrics are also moderate: URA’s xG stands at 1.62, with opponents conceding 1.27 xG, while SC Villa create 1.43 xG against 1.01 xG allowed by the hosts. Although the percentage of matches finishing Over 2.5 goals in the last five games was 40% for URA and 60% for SC Villa, the league as a whole is very low-scoring, averaging 1.43 goals with only 14% of matches going Over 2.5. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as this bet only loses if at least four goals are scored, and the defensive data and league profile do not support such an outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is for SC Villa to lead at half-time and hold on for the win, as the visitors led at the break in 75% of their recent matches, scoring an average of 1.5 goals in the first half. During the same period, URA led at half-time in only 40% of matches, while as many as 60% ended the first half level. The overall form clearly favours SC Villa: the team won 60% of its last five matches and scored an average of 1.8 goals, whereas URA recorded only 20% wins and 80% draws. The visitors conceded no goals before half-time in this sample, while URA conceded an average of 0.4 goals during that period, further strengthening the 2/2 option. However, the league’s low average of 1.43 goals per match limits confidence in the forecast and leaves a significant possibility of a half-time draw followed by an away win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
URASC Villa
11Shots7
URASC Villa
5Shots on target4
URASC Villa
1.69xG1.17
URASC Villa
11Corners1
URASC Villa
88Dangerous attacks61
URASC Villa
16Fouls19
URASC Villa
0Cards0
URASC Villa

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1
URASC Villa
1Goals conceded / match1
URASC Villa
67%Average possession50%
URASC Villa
2Shots on target / match2
URASC Villa

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4Shots per match6
URASC Villa
2Shots on target2
URASC Villa
50%Shot conversion16.7%
URASC Villa
67%Possession50%
URASC Villa
0.99xG for0.98
URASC Villa
1.18xG against1.24
URASC Villa

Shooting quality

URA: Efficient finishingSC Villa: Efficient finishing
URASC Villa
Accuracy (shots on target)50%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.250.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

URA is 200% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - URA · 1 pts / match - SC Villa

URA
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
SC Villa
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

URA is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - URA · 1 goals / match - SC Villa

URA scoring profile: very strong

URA scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while SC Villa keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

SC Villa scoring profile: very strong

SC Villa scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

2Goals scored (season)1
URASC Villa
1Goals conceded (season)1
URASC Villa
3Average goals in match2
URASC Villa
2Goals scored (last 5)1
URASC Villa
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
URASC Villa

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
URASC Villa
100%2 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%3 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%4 goals0%
URASC Villa

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
URASC Villa
0%2 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%3 goals0%
URASC Villa
0%4 goals0%
URASC Villa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
URASC Villa
0%Scored in both halves0%
URASC Villa

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
URASC Villa
100%BTTS - last 5100%
URASC Villa

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
URASC Villa

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
URASC Villa
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
URASC Villa

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

URA - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
SC Villa - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)3
URASC Villa
0Goals scored (1st half)1
URASC Villa
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
URASC Villa
1Average goals (1st half)1
URASC Villa
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
URASC Villa
100%No goal before half-time0%
URASC Villa

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0
URASC Villa
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
URASC Villa
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
URASC Villa
2Average goals (2nd half)1
URASC Villa
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
URASC Villa
0%No goal after half-time100%
URASC Villa

URA - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SC Villa - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.003.00
Goals scored / match0.02.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
SC Villa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.00
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

URA
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

SC Villa
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+2.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

SC Villa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaSC Villa
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.20▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%47%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%40%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%30%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%53%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%73%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.20
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Frank SsebuufuA 1
—Reagan Mpande⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SC VillaGoalReagan MpandeAssist: Frank Ssebuufu

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): URA 0 - 1 - 1 SC Villa. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of URA vs SC Villa?

The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:1 SC Villa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between URA and SC Villa?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches URA won 0, SC Villa won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before URA vs SC Villa?

URA score 2.00 goals per game on average and SC Villa 1.00. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 100% of URA's matches and 100% of SC Villa's.

What form are URA and SC Villa in?

Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and SC Villa 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs SC Villa?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs SC Villa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.