El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónEstadio Sergio Torres RiveraData current as of 06 September 2026

Firpo vs CD Platense: match statistics

Firpo crest
Firpo
1 : 0half-time 1:0
CD Platense crest
CD Platense

Firpo vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Firpo played CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Sergio Torres Rivera. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Firpo: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match. CD Platense: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Firpo scores 1.75 and concedes 0.25 goals per match. CD Platense scores 1.50 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.45 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Firpo 25%, CD Platense 75%. Over 2.5: Firpo 25%, CD Platense 25%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 2.00 vs 1.40. Firpo: 13.5 shots per match, CD Platense: 7.8.

Match halves

Firpo: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. CD Platense: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Firpo: 61-75 (3 goals). CD Platense: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 5-1-0. Average goals 3.17, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Firpo boasts a very strong home record: they have won both matches played so far, averaging 3 goals scored and conceding none. The hosts create significantly more danger, averaging 16 shots, including 10.5 on target, compared with CD Platense’s average of just 4 shots and 1.5 on target away from home. Firpo’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances, with an average xG of 2.41 compared with the visitors’ 0.99, while their last five matches have produced 11 goals. CD Platense remain unbeaten, but both of their away matches ended in draws; they score only 1 goal and concede 1 per game on average. The visitors’ solid form could increase the likelihood of a draw, but the numbers clearly point to a Firpo victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Firpo are clearly stronger defensively: they concede an average of just 0.5 goals per game this season and only 0.4 across their last five matches, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their fixtures. CD Platense average 1.0 goal per match but create few chances, as evidenced by just 4.0 shots and 1.5 shots on target per game. The hosts are in excellent scoring form, averaging 2.2 goals and an xG of 2.05 over their last five appearances, making a Firpo win to nil a realistic scenario. Although Platense have seen BTTS - Yes in 100% of their matches so far this season, the sample is small, while only 20% of Firpo’s last 5 matches ended with both teams scoring. With the league-average BTTS rate standing at 46%, the stronger selection is BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Firpo show clearly greater attacking potential: over their last 5 matches, they have averaged 2.2 goals, compared with 1.2 goals for CD Platense. The hosts conceded just 0.4 goals per game during this period, while Platense average only 1.5 shots on target per match compared with Firpo’s 8.0, limiting the prospects of a high-scoring game for the visitors. The combined xG averages suggest approximately 2.2 goals, despite Firpo recording an xG of 1.81 and their opponents creating chances worth an average of 1.66 xG against them. None of the teams’ matches to date has produced more than 3 goals, which is why Under 3.5 goals is the market best supported by the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Firpo have a clear quality advantage: they average 2.0 goals scored and just 0.5 conceded at home, while Platense average 1.0 goal scored and 1.0 conceded away. The hosts have won 100% of their home matches so far, whereas the visitors are still without an away win and have drawn 100% of such games. In the first halves, Firpo led at the break in 50% of their home matches and have not conceded a single goal, while Platense were trailing at half-time in 50% of their away games, conceding an average of 1.0 goal. Their last five matches further support this trend: Firpo led after 45 minutes in 60% of games, scoring an average of 1.0 goal and conceding just 0.2. After the break, the hosts add an average of 1.5 goals at home, making a Firpo lead at half-time followed by a full-time victory the most likely HT/FT scenario: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
FirpoCD Platense
6Shots0
FirpoCD Platense
4Shots on target2
FirpoCD Platense
0.76xG0.33
FirpoCD Platense
3Corners4
FirpoCD Platense
15Dangerous attacks27
FirpoCD Platense
14Fouls16
FirpoCD Platense
0Cards0
FirpoCD Platense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match1.5
FirpoCD Platense
0.25Goals conceded / match0.75
FirpoCD Platense
54%Average possession48%
FirpoCD Platense
8Shots on target / match4.75
FirpoCD Platense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match7.75
FirpoCD Platense
8Shots on target4.75
FirpoCD Platense
13%Shot conversion19.4%
FirpoCD Platense
54%Possession48%
FirpoCD Platense
2xG for1.4
FirpoCD Platense
1.23xG against1.51
FirpoCD Platense

Shooting quality

Firpo: Efficient finishingCD Platense: Efficient finishing
FirpoCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)59%61%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo
DWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
CD Platense
DDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 25%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Firpo · 1.5 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.25 goals / match - Firpo · 0.75 goals / match - CD Platense

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)6
FirpoCD Platense
1Goals conceded (season)3
FirpoCD Platense
2Average goals in match2.25
FirpoCD Platense
7Goals scored (last 5)6
FirpoCD Platense
1Goals conceded (last 5)3
FirpoCD Platense

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
FirpoCD Platense
50%2 goals50%
FirpoCD Platense
25%3 goals0%
FirpoCD Platense
25%4 goals0%
FirpoCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

25%1 goal75%
FirpoCD Platense
0%2 goals0%
FirpoCD Platense
0%3 goals0%
FirpoCD Platense
0%4 goals0%
FirpoCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
FirpoCD Platense
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FirpoCD Platense
50%Scored in both halves25%
FirpoCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
FirpoCD Platense
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FirpoCD Platense
25%BTTS - last 575%
FirpoCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
FirpoCD Platense
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
FirpoCD Platense
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FirpoCD Platense

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
FirpoCD Platense
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
FirpoCD Platense
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
FirpoCD Platense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Firpo · 1.25 pts / match - CD Platense

Firpo - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.25
FirpoCD Platense
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.5
FirpoCD Platense
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
FirpoCD Platense
0.75Average goals (1st half)1
FirpoCD Platense
100%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FirpoCD Platense
50%No goal before half-time50%
FirpoCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)2.5
FirpoCD Platense
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
FirpoCD Platense
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
FirpoCD Platense
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.25
FirpoCD Platense
75%Clean sheet after half-time75%
FirpoCD Platense
25%No goal after half-time25%
FirpoCD Platense

Firpo - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - second-half results

75% W25% R0% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.3
Average goals in match0.81.3
1 goal50%75%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%75%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.252.50
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.3
Average goals in match1.01.3
1 goal75%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%75%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.98
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
25%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FirpoLigaCD Platense
Average goals in match 2.002.45 2.25
Both teams scored 25%45% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%39% 25%
Clean sheets 75%36% 25%
Goal before half-time 50%58% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%67% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Óscar Elías Cerén Delgado⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FirpoGoalÓscar Elías Cerén Delgado

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Firpo 5 - 1 - 0 CD Platense. Average goals 3.17, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Firpo vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 1:0 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and CD Platense?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Firpo won 5, CD Platense won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs CD Platense?

Firpo score 1.75 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.50. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Firpo's matches and 75% of CD Platense's.

What form are Firpo and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and CD Platense 2-2-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs CD Platense?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.